2020
DOI: 10.1039/d0cp03160g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of ethanol dynamics in aqueous and non-aqueous solutions

Abstract: In this study we compare the results for vibrational, reorientational and hydrogen bond dynamics of ethanol in water and hexane across the whole concentration range. Water and hexane are both...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lifetimes of these two species versus solvent component were plotted in Figure 3 d–f and showed the three-range distribution. It is not difficult to understand that the low molar fraction of n -hexane prefers to avoid the interaction with hydroxyl heads of ethanol and tend to have hydrophobic interactions with the ethanol alkyl tails 31 ( Figure 3 d), whereas the low molar fraction of ethanol is prone to spontaneously interact with itself through hydrogen-bond interactions, exposing the alkyl tails to the outside to form a hydrophobic interaction with n -hexane ( Figure 3 f). Similarly, the system of a carbon tetrachloride-ethanol solution disfavored the high-polarity of IM s and contributed to a left equilibrium ( Figures S23–S28 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lifetimes of these two species versus solvent component were plotted in Figure 3 d–f and showed the three-range distribution. It is not difficult to understand that the low molar fraction of n -hexane prefers to avoid the interaction with hydroxyl heads of ethanol and tend to have hydrophobic interactions with the ethanol alkyl tails 31 ( Figure 3 d), whereas the low molar fraction of ethanol is prone to spontaneously interact with itself through hydrogen-bond interactions, exposing the alkyl tails to the outside to form a hydrophobic interaction with n -hexane ( Figure 3 f). Similarly, the system of a carbon tetrachloride-ethanol solution disfavored the high-polarity of IM s and contributed to a left equilibrium ( Figures S23–S28 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ethanol molecules have a stronger interaction with the single-molecule indicator than tetrahydrofuran and lead to larger peak groups. However, they also have a stronger interaction with water and are trapped in the hydrogen-bond network, thus causing a relatively slow diffusion and a longer interval among peak groups of r-SMES, which agrees with previous works. , Based on single-molecule solvation by different solvents, the r-SMES shed light on not only the heterogeneity of the solution but also the internal interactions in the solution. Note that there are some other factors that affect the significance of the current model switching and the r-SMES, such as the short time scale of the transition-state solvation, which cannot achieved by our sampling rate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We turned to hydrogen bond (HB) analysis to quantify the observations from the video. The HB analysis used in this paper is a staple in the research of liquids and liquid mixtures and workers in the field have used this methodology for quantifying the hydrogen bonding process in water, alcohols, and related mixtures. This same analysis is relevant for studying the interaction of proteins with water, for example, in protein hydration. , In this work, we primarily focus on the interaction between metformin and the protein via Hbonding.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For investigating the origin of anomaly properties of aqueous EtOH solutions, it is necessary to observe the intermolecular interactions between EtOH and H 2 O in a molecular scale. Local structures of EtOH and H 2 O in aqueous EtOH solutions have been studied by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Molecular interactions in aqueous EtOH solutions have also been investigated experimentally by using Raman spectroscopy, mass spectroscopy, nuclear magnetic resonance, dielectric relaxation measurements, infrared spectroscopy, , and near-infrared spectroscopy . Two concentration regions separated by the boundary of x = 0.2 are found in aqueous EtOH solutions (EtOH) x (H 2 O) 1– x from Raman spectroscopy, mass spectroscopy, and dielectric relaxation measurements. , Four concentration regions separated by the boundaries of x = 0.8, 0.2, and 0.08 are found from nuclear magnetic resonance measurements .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%