2021
DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Analysis of Biodentine, Calcium Hydroxide, and 2% Chlorhexidine with Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement as Indirect Pulp Capping Materials in Young Permanent Molars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indirect pulp capping is a routine treatment for deep dentin car-ies in young permanent teeth. The traditional indirect pulp capping of young permanent teeth using calcium hydroxide preparation, Dycal, showed a high success rate ranging between 77.78% and 93% [15][16][17]. For deep caries of young permanent teeth, the effect of two-step indirect pulp capping is superior against one step [18].…”
Section: Vpt Of Young Permanent Teethmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indirect pulp capping is a routine treatment for deep dentin car-ies in young permanent teeth. The traditional indirect pulp capping of young permanent teeth using calcium hydroxide preparation, Dycal, showed a high success rate ranging between 77.78% and 93% [15][16][17]. For deep caries of young permanent teeth, the effect of two-step indirect pulp capping is superior against one step [18].…”
Section: Vpt Of Young Permanent Teethmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also favorable results for other lesser-known materials such as ENDOCEM-Zr®, which together with MTA had high success rates and, in comparison between them did not have statistically significant differences [19] . This study highlights the success of IPC in young permanent molars and Biodentine is identified as the best choice of IPC material [11] . Biodentine can be used effectively as an indirect drug for pulp protection in primary teeth and has similar clinical and radiographic success to 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in conjunction with RMGIC and calcium hydroxide (CH) [15] .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In another group, 87.5% of cases of teeth treated with chlorhexidine gluconate and 2% followed by resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) showed successful results. Finally, 91.66% of the cases of teeth treated with calcium hydroxide showed successful results [11] . Similarly, the success rate of stepwise caries excavation was 97.3%, which was found to be significantly higher than IPC, with 82.4% [12] .…”
Section: Permanent Teethmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Some materials that can be used for pulp capping include calcium hydroxide, mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), calcium-silicate based cement, calciumphosphate based cement, zinc oxide eugenol, and resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC). 5 In this case, operator used calcium hydroxide for indirect pulp capping treatment. Based on the literature, until now, calcium hydroxide is still the gold standard for pulp capping materials.…”
Section: Second Visitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, calcium hydroxide has several disadvantages, namely high solubility, lack of adhesion and poor physico-mechanical properties. [5][6][7] In particular, the effectiveness of the seal they can provide against ingress of bacteria during the repair period is questionable. So it is usually used with glass ionomer cement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%