2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11240-017-1196-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analyses of transcriptome and proteome in response to cotton bollworm between a resistant wild soybean and a susceptible soybean cultivar

Abstract: and four genes were significantly up-regulated in response to H. armigera in ED059 while down-regulated or not changed in cv. Tianlong 2. GO analyses showed the specifically expressed genes in ED059 were mainly enriched in metabolism-related pathways. The function of one potential resistant gene involved in the phenylpropanoid pathway was confirmed by use of transgenic Arabidopsis. Our study provided useful resources for the soybean improvement, which could contribute to the elucidation of defense mechanisms a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…25 The molecular mechanism of soybean defense against cotton bollworm was also explored by combined transcriptome-proteome analysis, and the function of a resistance gene was confirmed in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. 26 To date, there have been few reports on the use of combined omics analysis to explore soybean seed hardness. 27 In this study, we identified genes that showed differential expression between a hard and nonhard line at both the transcript and protein levels.…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 The molecular mechanism of soybean defense against cotton bollworm was also explored by combined transcriptome-proteome analysis, and the function of a resistance gene was confirmed in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. 26 To date, there have been few reports on the use of combined omics analysis to explore soybean seed hardness. 27 In this study, we identified genes that showed differential expression between a hard and nonhard line at both the transcript and protein levels.…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To identify putative cis-regulatory elements (CREs) commonly found in soybean gene promoters related to biotic stress, we selected 50 top-list upregulated genes using six transcriptome-wide expression data in which soybean was Regulated plant promoters and soybean biotic stress-related cis-elements 13-25 subjected to several pests, including: one virus (Soybean Mosaic Virus -SMV - (Zhang et al, 2019), two caterpillars (H. armigera and Lamprosema indicate - (Wang et al, 2017;Zeng et al, 2017), two fungi (Sclerotinia Sclerotiorum and Fusarium oxysporum - (Chang et al, 2019;Ranjan et al, 2019), and one nematode (M. javanica) (Beneventi et al, 2013). The gene list and their respective annotations are shown in Supplementary Table S1.…”
Section: Cis-acting Co-incident Elements In Soybean Promoters From Genes Responsible For Broad-spectrum Biotic Stress Conditions: New Permentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genomic tools, such as transcriptome analysis, can aid in the identification of resistance genes and the development of blight-resistant chestnut [ 2 ]. High-throughput RNA-seq has been used to study genetic and molecular mechanisms underlying host plant resistance to pests [ 10 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ]. Additionally, an investigation of the host transcriptome change in response to pests can facilitate the isolation of resistance genes, which can improve the efficiency of resistant varieties breeding by genetic engineering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%