2013
DOI: 10.1080/00103624.2013.839698
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Analyses of Lead and Copper in Metal-Accumulating Plants with and without Mycorrhizae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently the analytical sensitivity markedly improves, permitting trace level analysis. We have shown (Alvarado et al 2013 in press) that samples of masses lower than the recommended mass for ideal analysis (as frequently occur in the biosciences), can be analyzed for relative elemental concentrations with sufficient accuracy. The detectable elemental range is from Na to U.…”
Section: Morphological Measurements and Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently the analytical sensitivity markedly improves, permitting trace level analysis. We have shown (Alvarado et al 2013 in press) that samples of masses lower than the recommended mass for ideal analysis (as frequently occur in the biosciences), can be analyzed for relative elemental concentrations with sufficient accuracy. The detectable elemental range is from Na to U.…”
Section: Morphological Measurements and Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example; neutron, [27] electron [9,19,34,35] and X-ray [24,26,27,29,[33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] sources may be used to visualize the distribution of metals at the surface of plant material including the cross-sections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21] Techniques for heavy metal quantitative and qualitative analysis vary in the amount of sample preparation required from bulk to surface measurements. [22,23] For bulk and quantitative measurement of metals which require separation of plant parts, drying, and acid digestion [1,9,19] ; atomic absorption spectroscopy [24][25][26][27][28][29] allows single element analysis at low concentrations, [22,30] while the inductively coupled plasma (ICP) [1,6,9,19,[31][32][33] allows analysis of up to 70 elements at low concentrations. [22,30] In general, acid digestion and considerable sample treatment are the disadvantages of these methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%