1983
DOI: 10.1007/bf01610109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative acute oral toxicity ofpara-aminopropiophenone (PAPP) in mammals and birds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
37
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown, there are marked differences in the PAPP LD5 0 values, which varied with strain, species (43,78), sex (18), and route of administration (79). These variations in the LD 50 may be explained by differences in the rate of microsomal metabolism of PAPP to the active compound, PHAPP, and/or the MetHb reductase activity (89).…”
Section: Genotoxicity and Mutagenicity Testsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…As shown, there are marked differences in the PAPP LD5 0 values, which varied with strain, species (43,78), sex (18), and route of administration (79). These variations in the LD 50 may be explained by differences in the rate of microsomal metabolism of PAPP to the active compound, PHAPP, and/or the MetHb reductase activity (89).…”
Section: Genotoxicity and Mutagenicity Testsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Mammalian carnivores appear generally more susceptible to oral doses of the aryl amine compound p-aminopropriophenone (PAPP) than either rodents or birds (Table 1) as found by Savarie et al (1983) in an investigation of PAPP as a potentially selective coyote (Canis latrans) toxicant. Currently there is renewed interest in its potential as a toxicant for the management of introduced pest predators such as feral cats (Felis catus; Australian Pesticides & Veterinary Medicines Authority 2006 www.apvma.gov.au/chemrev/ 1080_faq.shtml) and canids (Vulpes vulpes, Canis familiaris) in Australia (Marks et al, 2004;Fleming et al, 2006) and stoats (Mustela erminea; and ferrets (Mustela furo) in New Zealand (Fisher and O'Connor, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Toxicity studies established that mammalian carnivores were particularly susceptible to PAPP, leading to investigations as a toxin to control coyotes (Canis latrans) in the USA (Savarie et al 1983;Eason et al 2014). In Australia, development of PAPP over the last decade or so has focussed on applications to target feral cats (Felis catus), European red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and wild dogs (Fleming et al 2014;Marks et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%