Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Background Systemic therapy (ST) is a psychotherapeutic intervention in complex human systems (both psychological and interpersonal). Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is an established treatment for children and adolescents with mental disorders. As methodologically rigorous systematic reviews on ST in this population are lacking, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the benefit and harm of ST (and ST as an add-on to CBT) with CBT in children and adolescents with mental disorders. Methods We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and other sources for randomised controlled trials in 14 mental disorder classes for the above comparisons in respect of effects on patient-relevant outcomes (search date: 7/2022). Where possible, meta-analyses were performed and results were graded into 3 different evidence categories: “proof”, “indication”, or “hint” (or none of these categories). PRISMA standards were followed. Results Fifteen studies in 5 mental disorder classes with usable data were identified. 2079 patients (mean age: 10 to 19 years) were analysed. 12/15 studies and 29/30 outcomes showed a high risk of bias. In 2 classes, statistically significant and clinically relevant effects in favour of ST were found, supporting the conclusion of a hint of greater benefit of ST for mental and behavioural disorders due to psychoactive substance use and of ST as an add-on to CBT for obsessive-compulsive disorders. In 2 other classes (eating disorders; hyperkinetic disorders), there was no evidence of greater benefit or harm of ST. For affective disorders, a statistically significant effect to the disadvantage of ST was found for 1 outcome, supporting the conclusion of a hint of lesser benefit of ST. Conclusions Our results show a hint of greater benefit of ST (or ST as an add-on to CBT) compared with CBT for 2 mental disorder classes in children and adolescents (mental and behavioural disorders due to psychoactive substance use, obsessive compulsive disorders). Given the importance of CBT as a control intervention, ST can therefore be considered a beneficial treatment option for children and adolescents with certain mental disorders. Limitations include an overall high risk of bias of studies and outcomes and a lack of data for several disorders.
Background Systemic therapy (ST) is a psychotherapeutic intervention in complex human systems (both psychological and interpersonal). Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is an established treatment for children and adolescents with mental disorders. As methodologically rigorous systematic reviews on ST in this population are lacking, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the benefit and harm of ST (and ST as an add-on to CBT) with CBT in children and adolescents with mental disorders. Methods We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and other sources for randomised controlled trials in 14 mental disorder classes for the above comparisons in respect of effects on patient-relevant outcomes (search date: 7/2022). Where possible, meta-analyses were performed and results were graded into 3 different evidence categories: “proof”, “indication”, or “hint” (or none of these categories). PRISMA standards were followed. Results Fifteen studies in 5 mental disorder classes with usable data were identified. 2079 patients (mean age: 10 to 19 years) were analysed. 12/15 studies and 29/30 outcomes showed a high risk of bias. In 2 classes, statistically significant and clinically relevant effects in favour of ST were found, supporting the conclusion of a hint of greater benefit of ST for mental and behavioural disorders due to psychoactive substance use and of ST as an add-on to CBT for obsessive-compulsive disorders. In 2 other classes (eating disorders; hyperkinetic disorders), there was no evidence of greater benefit or harm of ST. For affective disorders, a statistically significant effect to the disadvantage of ST was found for 1 outcome, supporting the conclusion of a hint of lesser benefit of ST. Conclusions Our results show a hint of greater benefit of ST (or ST as an add-on to CBT) compared with CBT for 2 mental disorder classes in children and adolescents (mental and behavioural disorders due to psychoactive substance use, obsessive compulsive disorders). Given the importance of CBT as a control intervention, ST can therefore be considered a beneficial treatment option for children and adolescents with certain mental disorders. Limitations include an overall high risk of bias of studies and outcomes and a lack of data for several disorders.
Aborder la question de la consommation de cannabis à l’adolescence reste souvent difficile, surtout entre parents et enfants. En partant de données épidémiologiques généralistes de l’usage de cannabis à l’adolescence et de l’expérience clinique des consultations jeunes consommateurs, nous présenterons la valeur expérientielle que peut prendre cet usage à une période spécifique de développement qu’est l’adolescence avec ses enjeux d’individuation au sein d’un milieu écologique et familial. Adapter les postures professionnelles et accompagner les parents à devenir acteurs des enjeux développementaux, mis à mal par les usages de substances, permettent à l’adolescent de s’autoriser à investir cet espace-temps de parole pour s’individuer.
Objectif : Cette étude a pour objectif de dresser une cartographie exhaustive de l’état actuel des connaissances sur l’efficience de l’autocompassion dans la prévention de la rechute de substances. Méthode : Deux recherches distinctes répondant chacune aux critères de la revue systématique Prisma ont été réalisées en utilisant les stratégies de coping comme variable médiatrice ; au total, 78 articles furent intégrés à l’étude. Résultats : Les résultats rendent compte d’un effet bénéfique de l’autocompassion dans la prévention de la rechute grâce à la diminution du recours aux stratégies de coping évitantes et au développement de stratégies de coping vigilantes centrées sur l’émotion. L’autocompassion semble aussi corrélée positivement aux autres types de coping adaptatifs, mais dépendrait davantage du contexte. Cet effet bénéfique est avant tout important à court terme car il permettrait de protéger l’individu des facteurs précipitant la rechute de substances tels que les affects négatifs et de développer d’autres stratégies plus efficaces sur le long terme. Conclusion : Ces résultats paraissent pertinents dans le développement de nouveaux moyens de prévenir la rechute de substances mais nécessiteraient d’être approfondis par des études supplémentaires mettant en lien direct l’autocompassion à la prévention de la rechute de substances.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.