2019
DOI: 10.4067/s0717-95022019000200632
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparación de Tres Metodologías para Estimar el Porcentaje de Estatura Adulta en Niños y Niñas de 7 a 16 Años

Abstract: FLORES, O. L. A.; DE LEÓN, F. L. G.; BARRIGAS, C. F. & FRAGOSO, M. I. C. J. Comparación de tres metodologías para estimar el porcentaje de estatura adulta en niños y niñas de 7 a 16 años. Int. J. Morphol., 37(2):632-640, 2019.RESUMEN: El porcentaje de estatura adulta (PEA) es un indicador del estado de maduración, que refleja la variación en la tasa y progreso de crecimiento. Existen diversos métodos para estimar la estatura adulta, sin haberse documentado en la literatura de manera concreta sus similitudes o … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first group consisted of 245 boys and 173 girls; and was used to generate SA prediction equations from P-TW3 (independent variable). This methodological strategy was built to identify the coefficients used in the predictive equations, considering that SA and P-TW3, obtained through the same method, have a very high correlation 12 ; then P-TW3 was replaced by P-KR as predictor variable, assuming that P-TW3 and P-KR methods are not statistically different, as observed in a previously published study 33 . To estimate differences between TW3 and KR methods Flores and collaborators applied in a previous study One ANOVA, Bland-Altman graphs as well as a Kruskal-Wallis test.…”
Section: Procedurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first group consisted of 245 boys and 173 girls; and was used to generate SA prediction equations from P-TW3 (independent variable). This methodological strategy was built to identify the coefficients used in the predictive equations, considering that SA and P-TW3, obtained through the same method, have a very high correlation 12 ; then P-TW3 was replaced by P-KR as predictor variable, assuming that P-TW3 and P-KR methods are not statistically different, as observed in a previously published study 33 . To estimate differences between TW3 and KR methods Flores and collaborators applied in a previous study One ANOVA, Bland-Altman graphs as well as a Kruskal-Wallis test.…”
Section: Procedurementioning
confidence: 99%