Comparação entre as abordagens ecológica e cognitivista para o treino da tomada de decisão no ténis e no rugby

Passos, Pedro; Batalau, Rui; Gonçalves, Pedro

doi:10.5628/rpcd.06.03.305

Cited by 6 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Consequently, coaching methods are adopted which seek to decrease the variability of actions in players and the uncertainty of their decisionmaking processes (e.g., practising skills unopposed, or with passive opposition, in order to facilitate the skills performance; or practising repetitive drills to reduce the uncertainty of movement skill performance). (For research on those methods, see Passos et al [5]). This trend in coaching mirrors a significant proposal in psychological science that automatising motor skill performance can reduce the information-processing burden on individuals [6].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Manipulating Constraints to Train Decision Making in Rugby Union

Passos

Araújo

Davids

et al. 2008

International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching

Self Cite

128

148

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper focuses on the paradoxical relationship between game unpredictability and the certainty of players' actions in team ball sports. Our research on this relationship leads us to suggest a method for training decision making, which we exemplify in the team sport of Rugby Union. The training methodology is based on application of theoretical insights from Ecological Psychology Complex Dynamical Systems and the Constraints-Led Approach. The paper starts with a critical overview of traditional approaches to studying decision making in sport. Next we describe the sport of Rugby Union to exemplify a complex dynamical system, and explain how that conceptualisation captures the interactions of players within that performance context. We conclude our analysis by describing how to manipulate task constraints to improve decision-making performance, as players search for an appropriate blend of stability and variability in their actions. In the final part of the paper, we suggest some methods to train decision making based on four stages: I) identifying the problem; ii) setting out a strategy to solve it; iii) creating an action model; and iv) building a decision-making exercise. The main conclusion from our work for coaches and sports scientists is that decision making should be improved through training methods that provide an accurate balance between stability of actions, which gives structure to the players' performance, and variability which allows them to cope with the uncertainty of situational constraints, such as the behaviour of specific opponents

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Manipulating Constraints to Train Decision Making in Rugby Union

Passos

Araújo

Davids

et al. 2008

International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching

Self Cite

128

148

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Passos et al (2006) estudaram dois grupos de atletas, tenistas e praticantes de rugby. O estudo tinha como objetivo determinar a existência de diferenças na evolução do desempenho das seguintes tarefas: a placagem no Rugby e o primeiro serviço no Tênis.…”

Section: Atenção No Tênisunclassified

Treinamento mental no tênis: revisão sistemática da literatura

Godtsfriedt¹,

Andrade²,

Vasconcellos³

2014

Rev. Bras. Ciênc. Esporte

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…xidade espacial e multiplicidade de interações, mesmo considerando o papel do processamento paralelo. adicionalmente, a perspetiva cognitiva baseia-se na separação Cartesiana entre mente e corpo (37) , bem como numa visão computacional da mente (67) . tal implica a necessidade de criar representações internas da informação e sua interpretação, um procedimento inviável em muitas ações rápidas, como aquelas que tipificam os Jd (11,86) .…”

unclassified

“…esta ligação bidirecional entre perceção e ação foi demonstrada nos estudos de slobounov et al (75) e stoffregen et al (76) . trata-se de uma relação complexa de mútua dependência e causalidade circular entre sistemas percetivos e sistemas de movimento (37,67) , no seio da qual emerge a tomada de decisão (5,90), a qual se vai alterando no decurso da ação (83) . estes acoplamentos perceção-ação são específicos para cada contexto (66) e remetem para outro conceito nuclear no âmbito das teorias ecológicas -a noção de constrangimento.…”

unclassified