2019
DOI: 10.18677/encibio_2019a37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparação Do Uso De Aplicação Aérea E Terrestre Na Qualidade De Deposição De Produto Na Cultura Da Soja

Abstract: RESUMOO objetivo do presente trabalho foi a avaliação da qualidade de aplicação de produto fitossanitário nas plataformas aérea e terrestre na cultura da soja. Na plataforma de aplicação terrestre foi utilizado o pulverizador autopropelido marca John Deere, modelo JD 4730 o volume de calda utilizado foi de 100 L ha -1 , velocidade de deslocamento de 14 km h -1 e pressão de trabalho de 4.8 bar. A aplicação aérea foi realizada com o avião agrícola marca Embraer, modelo Ipanema equipado com jato atomizador modelo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In corn applications, there was a decreasing gradient in deposition between the thirds going up the plants, regardless of the significance of the treatments. A similar effect was reported by Machado and Reynaldo [36] when evaluating the differences between aerial and ground applications. This difference can be mitigated depending on the equipment and technology used [37].…”
Section: Univariate Analysis Of Variance and Effect Size (η 2 )supporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In corn applications, there was a decreasing gradient in deposition between the thirds going up the plants, regardless of the significance of the treatments. A similar effect was reported by Machado and Reynaldo [36] when evaluating the differences between aerial and ground applications. This difference can be mitigated depending on the equipment and technology used [37].…”
Section: Univariate Analysis Of Variance and Effect Size (η 2 )supporting
confidence: 86%
“…A higher application rate could result in a less technical application, characterized by a higher relative span factor (0.68) when compared to the lower application rate (0.55) (Table S1). However, these results cannot be considered as a determinant because droplet size uniformity (relative span factor) is more related to the different droplet sizes generated by the same spray tip [36]. The use of adjuvants had no effect.…”
Section: Univariate Analysis Of Variance and Effect Size (η 2 )mentioning
confidence: 91%