2006
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-84782006000500044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparação de métodos de medida indireta de massa de forragem em pasto de azevém anual (Lolium multiflorum Lam.)

Abstract: RESUMO Este trabalho foi realizado de maio a outubro de 2003, na Estação Experimental da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (EEA-UFRGS), tendo como objetivo avaliar e comparar a precisão do disco medidor de forragem, do bastão graduado e do medidor de capacitância em predizer a massa de forragem de pastagens de azevém anual. O trabalho INTRODUÇÃOO Brasil possui cerca de 160 milhões de cabeças de bovinos de corte, 1 milhão de bubalinos e 14 milhões de ovinos (ANUALPEC, 2004). Grande parte dessas espécies… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…SSH has been regarded as a better herbage mass predictor than RP and capacitance meters in annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) (Cauduro et al, 2006), even with r 2 lower than 0.70 due to excessive amounts of dead plant material at the base of the sward. Overall, research suggests that for temperate grasses both SSH and RP readings have good applicability giving both good herbage mass estimates, as r 2 often exceeds 0.90 and the CV are seldom above 10% (Bransby et al, 1977;Santillan et al, 1979;Griggs & Stringer, 1988).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…SSH has been regarded as a better herbage mass predictor than RP and capacitance meters in annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) (Cauduro et al, 2006), even with r 2 lower than 0.70 due to excessive amounts of dead plant material at the base of the sward. Overall, research suggests that for temperate grasses both SSH and RP readings have good applicability giving both good herbage mass estimates, as r 2 often exceeds 0.90 and the CV are seldom above 10% (Bransby et al, 1977;Santillan et al, 1979;Griggs & Stringer, 1988).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Due to the degree of uncertainty associated with calibration and validation of this capacitance probe, specially in legumes species (Mitra site), its general application should be approached with some reservation, with regard to estimation of pasture dry matter yield in Mediterranean conditions; a fact quoted by other authors. Cauduro et al (2006) obtained poor regression coefficients (R 2 = 0.149) and have acknowledged susceptible error factors, such as the existence of a high quantity of dead vegetation in the form of hay at the soil surface. Murphy et al (1995) and Virkajarvi (1999) reported moderate mean regression coefficients (R 2 = 0.42 and R 2 = 0.44, respectively).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interest in this evaluation process remains current as each pasture is a different ecosystem, with specific characteristics, which vary with different vegetative states of plants, according to type of grazing management. This interest has been demonstrated in different studies such as those by Stockdale and Kelly (1984), Hirata (2000), Silva and Cunha (2003), Zanine et al (2006) and Cauduro et al (2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A utilização do bastão graduado para medição da altura indica resultados aceitáveis para predição da disponibilidade de forragem na composição da dieta animal (CAUDURO et al, 2006). A redução na altura da pastagem, causada pela fi tointoxicação, por aplicação de herbicidas no estabelecimento, pode estender o tempo entre a semeadura e o início da utilização da forragem em pastejo.…”
Section: ----------------------------------Massa Seca ---------------unclassified