2021
DOI: 10.1142/s021919972150036x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compactness of Sobolev-type embeddings with measures

Abstract: We study compactness of embeddings of Sobolev-type spaces of arbitrary integer order into function spaces on domains in [Formula: see text] with respect to upper Ahlfors regular measures [Formula: see text], that is, Borel measures whose decay on balls is dominated by a power of their radius. Sobolev-type spaces as well as target spaces considered in this paper are built upon general rearrangement-invariant function norms. Several sufficient conditions for compactness are provided and these conditions are show… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This follows from the fact that lim sup t→0 + ψ(t) φ(t) = 1 and from (2.10). Therefore, W m X(Ω) → M ψ (Ω, ν) is not compact thanks to [8,Theorem 4.1]. Hence Y (Ω, ν) = M ψ (Ω, ν) has the desired properties.…”
Section: The Nonincreasing Rearrangement Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This follows from the fact that lim sup t→0 + ψ(t) φ(t) = 1 and from (2.10). Therefore, W m X(Ω) → M ψ (Ω, ν) is not compact thanks to [8,Theorem 4.1]. Hence Y (Ω, ν) = M ψ (Ω, ν) has the desired properties.…”
Section: The Nonincreasing Rearrangement Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to [8,Theorem 4.1], W m L p,q;α (Ω) → Y (Ω, ν) is not compact if and only if Y L p,q;α (Ω, ν) → Y (Ω, ν) is not almost-compact.…”
Section: ] and (28)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Combining our results with [4, Theorem 5.1] is a way to obtain some sharper Sobolev-Lorentz trace embedddings into Lorentz Λ-spaces on low-dimensional sets. Furthermore, our characterizations of (1.2) may also be used to get better compactness results for such embeddings (see [3,Remark 5.4]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%