2022
DOI: 10.4064/sm201119-29-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compactness of Sobolev embeddings and decay of norms

Abstract: We investigate the relationship between the compactness of embeddings of Sobolev spaces built upon rearrangement-invariant spaces into rearrangement-invariant spaces endowed with d-Ahlfors measures under certain restriction on the speed of their decay on balls. We show that the gateway to compactness of such embeddings, while formally describable by means of optimal embeddings and almost-compact embeddings, is quite elusive. It is known that such a Sobolev embedding is not compact when its target space has the… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, the target space in (1.6) is neither a Marcinkiewicz space nor it is disjointly superadditive (the latter observation, although it is most likely not available in an explicit form, is hidden in [23], as we shall point out), and so the techniques that successfully worked in earlier approaches cannot be used here. As for (1.7), although the target space is a Marcinkiewicz space as in [26], the method used there is not suitable for proving the maximal noncompactness of (1.7). The reason is that the logarithmic function defining the Marcinkiewicz space L ∞,∞, 1 n −1 (Ω) grows too slowly (or rather it is too slowly varying).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, the target space in (1.6) is neither a Marcinkiewicz space nor it is disjointly superadditive (the latter observation, although it is most likely not available in an explicit form, is hidden in [23], as we shall point out), and so the techniques that successfully worked in earlier approaches cannot be used here. As for (1.7), although the target space is a Marcinkiewicz space as in [26], the method used there is not suitable for proving the maximal noncompactness of (1.7). The reason is that the logarithmic function defining the Marcinkiewicz space L ∞,∞, 1 n −1 (Ω) grows too slowly (or rather it is too slowly varying).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%