2015
DOI: 10.1109/map.2015.2437284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compact MUSA: Modified U-slot patch antennas with reduced cross-polarization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The patch radius for this side length is calculated by using Equation (12). For this radius, actual P-MSA side length 'a' is calculated by using Equation (5).…”
Section: Design Procedures For P-msa With a Pair Of Slotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The patch radius for this side length is calculated by using Equation (12). For this radius, actual P-MSA side length 'a' is calculated by using Equation (5).…”
Section: Design Procedures For P-msa With a Pair Of Slotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, the MSA suffered from the disadvantage of narrow impedance bandwidth (BW). However, over the last four decades, many techniques have been reported for the BW enhancement, and among them slot cut method is widely used [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. An increase in the BW of slot cut MSA is realized by employing multiple slots [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the size of a microwave antenna with a narrow beam is considerable at Ku-, X- and C-bands. Though recent advancement in antenna technologies allow to make them small enough to be installed on aircraft as a separate piece of equipment [ 23 ], installation of any additional equipment, especially on small aircraft, has its own drawbacks such as the reduction of aerodynamic characteristics, need for additional power supply etc. Accordingly, the most straightforward solution would be to also use the navigation equipment already available onboard for sea surface monitoring, in addition to its normal functionality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A modified U‐shaped slot is presented in Ref. which minimize the unwanted currents which gives rise to cross‐polar radiation. In Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The XP level of the microstrip antenna is comparatively high in the H‐plane due to the unwanted higher order radiating modes which affects the far‐field performance of the antenna . The XP level can be suppressed by different techniques like modified feed arrangement, the ground plane modification and the different topologies, but complexity increases with the structural modifications. In Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%