2010
DOI: 10.1002/mop.25548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compact groove‐loaded triband antenna for WLAN/WiMAX applications

Abstract: can be observed that the radiation patterns are not uniform totally in azimuth plane. This may be due to two factors. One is the current distribution is not totally uniform around the central axis, because the feeding point departs from the central point. The other is that the ground plane is a little smaller in this design. Figure 9 shows the simulated and measured elevation radiation pattern (x-z plane) at 2.11 and 2.29 GHz. As revealed in elevation pattern, approximations to a conical beam patterns are achi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to many antennas proposed in recent papers [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15], this antenna is designed based on a rather simple structure and suitable for all the WLAN/WiMAX frequency bands. By introducing a pair of symmetrical inverted L-strips and an elliptical-arc-shaped stub, the proposed antenna can generate two separate resonances at 3.5 and 5.5 GHz, while the trapezoid and ellipse slot on the ground plane is to excite the lowest resonant mode.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Compared to many antennas proposed in recent papers [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15], this antenna is designed based on a rather simple structure and suitable for all the WLAN/WiMAX frequency bands. By introducing a pair of symmetrical inverted L-strips and an elliptical-arc-shaped stub, the proposed antenna can generate two separate resonances at 3.5 and 5.5 GHz, while the trapezoid and ellipse slot on the ground plane is to excite the lowest resonant mode.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owning to these merits, several promising types of dual-band and multiband antennas have been reported in the recent literature [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. For example, many printed monopole antennas with different shapes have been presented, including a printed symmetrical Gshaped antenna [1], a printed double-T-shaped antenna [2], an Lshaped and E-shaped antenna [3], and a planar antenna with a shorted parasitic inverted-L wire [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To study the antenna size reduction for the proposed C-shape monopole antenna, the comparisons of the overall antenna volumn including the ground plane for this proposed and other presented antenna designs in the literature [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] are listed in Table 4. It is seen that this proposed monopole antenna has more than 25% antenna size reduction to obtain compact operation, which is more suitable for embedding into the USB dongle.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The related monopole antenna (MA) designs for WiMAX applications have been presented by using dual U-shaped MA [1], inverted L-shaped MA [2], rhomb shaped MA with slits [3] or modified Minkowski fractal geometry [4], inverted-F antenna [5], MA with branch slits [6], MA with rectangular horizontal strips and trapezoidal ground plane [7], mirrored-L MA [8], asymmetric rectangular MA with additional strips [9], rectangular MA with a circular disc [10], MA loaded with four different grooves [11], MA using branch strips [12], pentagonal MA with two thin bent slots [13], MA with an etched ∩-shaped slot and a parasitic ring resonator [14], MA with two semi-circle strips [15], T-shaped MA with a trapezoidal ground plane [16], MA with C-shaped and Sshaped meander strips [17] or with C-shaped and L-shaped monopole strips [18] and rectangular MA with parasitic outside ring [19]. However, there is the disadvantage of being larger antenna size for these above MAs [1-7, 9, 10, 14-17, 19] or complex antenna structure [8,[11][12][13]18]. And, there is increasing demand for antennas having more compact size to be suitably embedded in the practical portable devices for multi-input/multi-output (MIMO) IEEE 802.16m WiMAX system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%