2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11856-011-0027-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Commutators in residually finite groups

Abstract: The following result is proved. Let n be a positive integer and G a residually finite group in which every product of at most 68 commutators has order dividing n. Then G is locally finite.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The general case of profinite groups is dealt with by bounding the nonsoluble length of the group, which enables induction on this length. (We introduced the nonsoluble length in [10], although bounds for nonsoluble length had been implicitly used in various earlier papers, for example, in the celebrated Hall-Higman paper [5], or in Wilson's paper [25]; more recently, bounds for the nonsoluble length were used in the study of verbal subgroups in finite and profinite groups [3,21,22,11].) Finally, the result for compact groups is derived with the use of the structure theorems for compact groups.…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general case of profinite groups is dealt with by bounding the nonsoluble length of the group, which enables induction on this length. (We introduced the nonsoluble length in [10], although bounds for nonsoluble length had been implicitly used in various earlier papers, for example, in the celebrated Hall-Higman paper [5], or in Wilson's paper [25]; more recently, bounds for the nonsoluble length were used in the study of verbal subgroups in finite and profinite groups [3,21,22,11].) Finally, the result for compact groups is derived with the use of the structure theorems for compact groups.…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general case of profinite groups is dealt with by bounding the nonsoluble length of the group, which enables induction on this length. (We introduced the nonsoluble length in [12], although bounds for nonsoluble length had been implicitly used in various earlier papers, for example, in the celebrated Hall-Higman paper [7], or in Wilson's paper [23]; more recently, bounds for the nonsoluble length were studied in connection with verbal subgroups in finite and profinite groups in [4,6,13,20,22]. )…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%