1989
DOI: 10.2140/pjm.1989.139.279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Commutative subalgebras of the ring of differential operators on a curve

Abstract: Let X denote an irreducible affine algebraic curve over the complex numbers. Let &{X) be the ring of regular functions on X. Denote by 3{X) the ring of differential operators on X. We wish to characterize (f(X) as a ring theoretic invariant of 3{X). It is proved that @{X) equals the set of all locally ad-nilpotent elements oi3f(X) if and only if X is not simply connected. However, for most simply connected curves, we show there exists a maximal commutative subalgebra oi3f{X)t consisting of locally ad-nilpotent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clearly, the ring O(X) of regular functions on X is a mad subalgebra of D(X). Theorems of Makar-Limanov and Perkins (see [17,18]) show that O(X) is the only mad subalgebra except in the case when X is a framed curve, by which we mean that there is a regular bijective map π : A 1 → X (thus topologically a framed curve is simply the affine line, but it may have an arbitrary finite number of cusps). From now on we suppose that X is a framed curve, since Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 can have interesting generalizations only in that case.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Clearly, the ring O(X) of regular functions on X is a mad subalgebra of D(X). Theorems of Makar-Limanov and Perkins (see [17,18]) show that O(X) is the only mad subalgebra except in the case when X is a framed curve, by which we mean that there is a regular bijective map π : A 1 → X (thus topologically a framed curve is simply the affine line, but it may have an arbitrary finite number of cusps). From now on we suppose that X is a framed curve, since Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 can have interesting generalizations only in that case.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The new part of Theorem 1.3 is thus the assertion that multiple points do not occur. The question of whether Spec B is necessarily a framed curve (that is, free of multiple points) was raised by P. Perkins (see [18]) in a special case where the mad subalgebra B is dual (in the sense of Section 5 below) to O(X). He raised also a more subtle question: setting Y := Spec B, is it true that D(X) is isomorphic to D(Y )?…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By [9, Proposition 3.11], it follows that 9-gr D(X) is a subring of C[x,y} and by [8,Lemma 2.3], x-gvD(X) is also a subring of C[x,y}. In the following lemma, we extend this to other gradings.…”
Section: Graded Algebras Of D(x)mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…PERKINS studies rings that satisfy these conditions in [8]. He shows that in many cases, D(X) contains maximal commutative ad-nilpotent subalgebras not isomorphic to 0(X).…”
Section: ••• + Fo(x) Of D(x) Sends G{x) C 0{x) To Fnwg^^x) + ••• + Fomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation