1990
DOI: 10.24033/bsmf.2143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rings of differential operators over rational affine curves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our first result is as follows. This theorem is a sharper version of a result of [15], where it is shown that the normalization of Spec B is always isomorphic to A 1 ; that means that Spec B is obtained from A 1 by introducing cusps, but also, perhaps, identifying certain points of A 1 to form double points, or even higher order multiple points. The new part of Theorem 1.3 is thus the assertion that multiple points do not occur.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Our first result is as follows. This theorem is a sharper version of a result of [15], where it is shown that the normalization of Spec B is always isomorphic to A 1 ; that means that Spec B is obtained from A 1 by introducing cusps, but also, perhaps, identifying certain points of A 1 to form double points, or even higher order multiple points. The new part of Theorem 1.3 is thus the assertion that multiple points do not occur.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…A detailed overview of the contents of the paper can be found in the introductory remarks to the individual sections that follow. Here we just mention that Sections 3 and 4 make no claim to originality, but are an exposition of some of the results of [15]. We give the exposition in some detail, because we rely heavily on these results, and the account of them given in [15] is not quite satisfying (specifically, part of Section 3 of that paper is missing, and the reference to [18] in the proof of its Corollary 4.6 seems difficult to justify directly).…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations