The Trypanosomiases 2004
DOI: 10.1079/9780851994758.0533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Community participation in tsetse control: the principles, potential and practice.

Abstract: This chapter focuses on the farmer/community-based approach to tsetse control. The principles and practicalities of involving farmers and communities in tsetse control are considered and achievements and constraints are highlighted.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is similarly the case with the control of bovine trypanosomiasis, which also requires some degree of co-ordination and organisation to be effective. That not a single community-based tsetse trapping project has been maintained by community members after project funding ceased illustrates the difficulties of engaging farmers in resource-poor areas in what is essentially a public good, even when using relatively low-cost technology [45,46]. Engaging communities in locally acceptable solutions for neglected diseases like sleeping sickness requires thinking broadly about the multiplicity of factors that may mediate uptake and sustainability and exploring innovation pathways to what are complex problems embedded within specific social, cultural, ecological, political and economic realities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is similarly the case with the control of bovine trypanosomiasis, which also requires some degree of co-ordination and organisation to be effective. That not a single community-based tsetse trapping project has been maintained by community members after project funding ceased illustrates the difficulties of engaging farmers in resource-poor areas in what is essentially a public good, even when using relatively low-cost technology [45,46]. Engaging communities in locally acceptable solutions for neglected diseases like sleeping sickness requires thinking broadly about the multiplicity of factors that may mediate uptake and sustainability and exploring innovation pathways to what are complex problems embedded within specific social, cultural, ecological, political and economic realities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiment 3. This qualitative experiment was conducted in the vicinity of Nguruman, Kenya, a site with a history of community-based tsetse control ( Dransfield & Brightwell, 2004 ). A polyester Nzi trap ( ' pure blue ' fabric 24 , Mihok, 2002 ) from the Vestergaard Frandsen Group (Kolding, Denmark) was used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are deeply imbedded barriers to behaviour changes that need to be considered and incorporated into educational strategies [ 108 ]. For example, the tensions between the public and private goods aspect of vector control has been noted for why people, otherwise knowledgeable about prevention practices, do not practice them [ 109 , 110 ]. Important differences between (sub-) populations may require different strategies, based on gender, age, wealth and livelihoods [ 111 , 112 ].…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps more problematic is the notion that community participation involves communities “doing it themselves” which overlooks the fact that such interventions essential create new social networks dependent on the implementing agency. The failure of many community-driven tsetse trap projects popular in the 1990s and 2000s is one example [ 110 ]. People were willing, to varying degree, to contribute money, time and effort but activities ceased in the absence of inputs and state/NGO/academic coordination [ 122 , 123 ].…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%