2008
DOI: 10.1177/1078087408326901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Community Organizations and Local Governance in a Metropolitan Region

Abstract: In a context of globalization, municipalities and metropolitan regions are involved in international competition to support economic growth. This leads to new forms of collaboration between public authorities and businesses, giving birth to new forms of urban and metropolitan governances. Moreover, many old neighborhoods of the central city and some districts of the old suburbs face growth in unemployment and poverty. In these local territories, community organizations put forward local development practices t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Monolithic and top‐down accounts of urban neoliberalism are also inadequate when understanding positions taken on social mix in specific local contexts, because neoliberal thought also embraces ‘community as policy’ via a downscaling of social and economic responsibilities at a local level. This tends to generate multi‐actor forms of local governance, thus providing the conditions for significant local contingency in policy implementation (Larner and Craig, 2005; Fontan et al ., 2009); as found in an in‐depth study of the Hope VI implementation process in four different local contexts in the USA (Chaskin and Joseph, 2010). Consequently, even where broad centralized policy orientations exist (which is not always the case), locally grounded agendas can shape policies in different ways in different places, and the interplay of dynamics set in motion by local systems of actors can create varied and not always predictable outcomes.…”
Section: Social MIX In Historical Perspective — An Idea Claimed By Dimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monolithic and top‐down accounts of urban neoliberalism are also inadequate when understanding positions taken on social mix in specific local contexts, because neoliberal thought also embraces ‘community as policy’ via a downscaling of social and economic responsibilities at a local level. This tends to generate multi‐actor forms of local governance, thus providing the conditions for significant local contingency in policy implementation (Larner and Craig, 2005; Fontan et al ., 2009); as found in an in‐depth study of the Hope VI implementation process in four different local contexts in the USA (Chaskin and Joseph, 2010). Consequently, even where broad centralized policy orientations exist (which is not always the case), locally grounded agendas can shape policies in different ways in different places, and the interplay of dynamics set in motion by local systems of actors can create varied and not always predictable outcomes.…”
Section: Social MIX In Historical Perspective — An Idea Claimed By Dimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notes 1. It should also be noted that the bulk of theoretical development has relied heavily on North American and European cases (e.g., Brenner, 1999;Brenner & Theodore, 2002;Fontan, Hamel, Morin, & Shragge, 2008;Frug & Barron, 2008;Stoker, 1998Stoker, , 2011. 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, when operating independently or on a local scale, their ability to tackle structural change is limited (Visser et al., 2017). And as Martin (2011) points out, despite their activist origins, many non-profit intermediaries end up simply becoming service providers that compensate for the inadequacies of the market (see also Fontan et al., 2009), enabling neoliberalization to proceed amidst constant crises and thereby assuming the role of ‘shadow market’ (Martin, 2011: 2938, see also Mayer, 2007; Pierre, 2009) in addition to that of ‘shadow state’. 3 This tension raises an important question about the prospects for civil society organizations to act in the interests of marginalized segments of society rather than the market or neoliberalizing state - a source of contention between a Polanyian and a Gramscian perspective.…”
Section: Non-profit Intermediaries: Civil Society Agents Of Change?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, the institutionalization of WISEs risks straining their ability to balance social and economic objectives and to combat the marketization of labour. WISEs are becoming more accountable to government, and state funding is increasingly tied to meeting short-term program deliverables (Dolbel, 2009; Fontan et al., 2009; Nyssens, 2006). Moreover, the business aspect of their operations places them in competition with other businesses in the same field – businesses that may not face the same turnover or limited skill base (Alberio and Tremblay, 2014; Cooney, 2011).…”
Section: Non-profit Intermediaries: Civil Society Agents Of Change?mentioning
confidence: 99%