2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2007.05521
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Community Network Auto-Regression for High-Dimensional Time Series

Abstract: Modeling responses on the nodes of a large-scale network is an important task that arises commonly in practice. This paper proposes a community network vector autoregressive (CNAR) model, which utilizes the network structure to characterize the dependence and intra-community homogeneity of the high dimensional time series. The CNAR model greatly increases the flexibility and generality of the network vector autoregressive (Zhu et al., 2017, NAR) model by allowing heterogeneous network effects across different… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature on change-point detection in dynamic networks include Yang et al (2011); Wang et al (2018); Wilson et al (2019); Zhao et al (2019); Bhattacharjee et al (2020); Zhu et al (2020a). While autoregressive models have been used in dynamic networks for modelling continuous responses observed from nodes (Zhu et al, 2017(Zhu et al, , 2019Chen et al, 2020;Zhu et al, 2020b), to our best knowledge no attempts have been made on modelling the dynamics of adjacency matrices in an autoregressive manner. Kang et al (2017) uses dynamic network as a tool to model non-stationary vector autoregressive processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature on change-point detection in dynamic networks include Yang et al (2011); Wang et al (2018); Wilson et al (2019); Zhao et al (2019); Bhattacharjee et al (2020); Zhu et al (2020a). While autoregressive models have been used in dynamic networks for modelling continuous responses observed from nodes (Zhu et al, 2017(Zhu et al, , 2019Chen et al, 2020;Zhu et al, 2020b), to our best knowledge no attempts have been made on modelling the dynamics of adjacency matrices in an autoregressive manner. Kang et al (2017) uses dynamic network as a tool to model non-stationary vector autoregressive processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our approach is especially related to the NAR model by Zhu et al (2017) and the community network autoregression (CNAR) by Chen et al (2020a). Specifically, Zhu et al (2017) develop a VAR model in which the dynamics depends on the structure of a network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, Zhu et al (2017) develop a VAR model in which the dynamics depends on the structure of a network. Chen et al (2020a) extend this approach by allowing for heterogeneous network effects across different network communities and cross-sectional dependence of errors through a latent factor structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Spatial autoregression model (SAR) [57], originally developed for spatial data analysis has been adopted for estimating network influence both when a single time point measurement of the network and outcome is available as well as in the longitudinal settings [7,43,47,44,42,35,89,45]. Recently the network autoregressive model (NAR) [89] and extensions of it [14,88,87,85], have been proposed as tools for modeling and predicting networked time series. Such models are closely related to the longitudinal version of the SAR models where both the outcome and the network are observed over multiple time points.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%