2004
DOI: 10.1080/0300393042000267218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Community Involvement in Rural Regeneration Partnerships: Exploring the Rural Dimension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several factors that can affect the level of community involvement attained in any given model. These include: physical geography and local environment; the extent and complexity of programmes and agencies operating in the area; the strength of social capital, the nature of local political relationships and the legitimacy of these new governance structures (Osborne et al, 2004 andConnelly et al, 2006). We would add that continued and increased involvement and co-operation by non-public agencies and other actors (including communities and individuals) can only be assured if they witness tangible results.…”
Section: Monitoring and Reviewmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…There are several factors that can affect the level of community involvement attained in any given model. These include: physical geography and local environment; the extent and complexity of programmes and agencies operating in the area; the strength of social capital, the nature of local political relationships and the legitimacy of these new governance structures (Osborne et al, 2004 andConnelly et al, 2006). We would add that continued and increased involvement and co-operation by non-public agencies and other actors (including communities and individuals) can only be assured if they witness tangible results.…”
Section: Monitoring and Reviewmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In particular, there are tensions and ambiguities in partnership practice between the structuring effect of state discourse and regeneration management in shaping the context of local partnership working and the potential scope for community-based challenges to elite governance arising from contingent, local factors (Osborne et al, 2004) or from a capacity to generate 'progressive', as well as 'parochial' and 'reactive', forms of politics (Cochrane, 2003;Newman, 2002). Osborne et al's work (2004, pp.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In terms of stakeholder identification, in many cases, significant overlap between rural event stakeholder types were identified (due scarce resources and organisational capacities); research shows, even for events organized primarily to attract outside visitors, the community remained the primary stakeholder group (strong involvement of community members in organization, sponsoring, participation and attendance in the events) (see [29,30]). The participation of rural community members in any kind of new initiative is dependent on several factors, including: physical geography and local environment; the extent and complexity of regeneration programs and agencies in the area; the nature of human and social capital in terms of existing skills and willingness to participate, existence of social exclusion; the strength of the local voluntary and community infrastructure; and the nature of local political relationships [31].…”
Section: Organisational Issues Of Rural Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%