2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rural governance, community empowerment and the new institutionalism: A case study of the Isle of Wight

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These activities encompass, for example, new firm foundations or the application of 'niche marketing strategies' by established SMEs (Dinis 2006, 19). These activities may also include bottom-up initiatives by local nonprofit organizations or the local government, such as the initiation of community-led enterprises (Clark, Southern, and Beer 2007;Haugh 2007) or spin-offs in cooperation with local firms and governmental authorities (Laukkanen and Niittykangas 2003). Such entrepreneurial activities may lead to improved economic (e.g.…”
Section: Conceptualizing Entrepreneurship As Place-dependent Local Pomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These activities encompass, for example, new firm foundations or the application of 'niche marketing strategies' by established SMEs (Dinis 2006, 19). These activities may also include bottom-up initiatives by local nonprofit organizations or the local government, such as the initiation of community-led enterprises (Clark, Southern, and Beer 2007;Haugh 2007) or spin-offs in cooperation with local firms and governmental authorities (Laukkanen and Niittykangas 2003). Such entrepreneurial activities may lead to improved economic (e.g.…”
Section: Conceptualizing Entrepreneurship As Place-dependent Local Pomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through reviewing international comparative studies and the published research which examines particular case studies and national experience of partnership working the common reasons for partnership failure/weakness can also be discerned: the exclusion of groups and individuals resulting in the absence of a cross-section of social groups especially the socially excluded (Ková ch, 2000;Yarwood, 2002;Considine, 2003;Lowndes and Sullivan, 2004;Shucksmith, 2000;Williams, 2003). unequal and contested power relations between partners resulting in tensions to the detriment of joint working and the domination of particular agencies and groups (Clark et al, 2007;Edwards et al, 2001;Larner and Butler, 2005;Lowndes and Sullivan, 2004;McAreavey, 2006). the instrumental use of partnership to attract funding without commitment to its normative principles resulting in weak relations between partners (Freshwater et al, 1993;Osborn, 1998;Shucksmith, 2000;Wasielewski, 2005).…”
Section: Partnerships In Theory and Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past two decades, community involvement in local policymaking has gained increasing attention as an alternative approach to rural development in the European Union (EU) (Barke & Newton, 1997;Clark, Southern, & Beer, 2007;Diaz-Puente, Yague, & Afonso, 2008;High & Nemes, 2007;MacKinnon, 2002;Osti, 2000;Ray, 2000;Saraceno, 1999;Scott, 2002;Storey, 1999;Valentinov, 2008) and worldwide (Belsky, 1999;Curtis & Lockwood, 2000;Fox, 1995;Francis & James, 2003;Rigg, 1991). The strategies of exogenous rural intervention in the early post-war period supported the state-led import of industries, technologies and skills into the underdeveloped rural areas, and received growing criticism of the excessive dependence on state subsidy, the marginalisation of the local, small-scale enterprises and the conservation of local inactivity (Ellis & Biggs, 2001;Murdoch, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%