2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.05.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Community gardening in poor neighborhoods in France: A way to re-think food practices?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
42
0
18

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
42
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…In the context of a deep economic crisis, leading to increasing health and food consumption inequalities [2], low-income populations appear to face more food insecurity than before [3]. They eat less recommended food products, especially fruits and vegetables [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of a deep economic crisis, leading to increasing health and food consumption inequalities [2], low-income populations appear to face more food insecurity than before [3]. They eat less recommended food products, especially fruits and vegetables [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Community gardening, for example, could raise gardeners' environmental awareness and encourage the adoption of more sustainable dietary practices by fostering collective thinking about biodiversity and eco-friendly practices [28]. Additionally, by providing access to fresh food harvested from the garden, community gardens could favor food affordability by reducing food expenses [29] or changing purchasing behaviors [30]. Community-based interventions targeting gardening thus appear as a relevant tool to positively influence the three fundamental pillars of sustainability -namely social (including health outcomes), environment and economy [31] and therefore, promote more sustainable lifestyles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, little is known about the contribution of garden productions to the diet of gardeners. In a previous study that we conducted in poor neighbourhoods of Marseille (France), we found that the household food supply of gardeners contained more F&V than that of their non-gardening neighbours (369 vs. 211 g/d per person, p = 0.03) [17]. Unexpectedly, this difference was mostly due to larger purchases of F&V, and not to the garden production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Baseline sample size was estimated based on a priori power analysis considering household supply of F&V as the primary outcome. The hypothesis was derived from our knowledge of the food supply content of community gardeners vs. non-gardeners, based on data collected in a cross-sectional study previously conducted in the south of France [17]. Assuming a potential attrition rate of 30% and a correlation of 0.6 across repeated measures, a total of 160 participants is required to detect a 30% increase in F&V supply in the new gardeners group (namely one portion of F&V) for 80% power at the 5% alpha level.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%