Abstract:There is often a rich but untold history of events that occurred and relationships that formed prior to the launching of a practice-based research network (PBRN.) This is particularly the case in PBRNs that are community-based and comprised of partnerships outside of the health care system. In this article we summarize an organizational "prenatal history" prior to the birth of a PBRN devoted to persons with developmental disabilities. Using a case study approach, this article describes the historical events th… Show more
“…Competing agenda was indicated by statements stressing that practitioner priorities were important. 9,35,96,111,112,122,[170][171][172] In some publications, we also found information about leadership processes for cocreating the research agenda, 81,83,86,99,110,125,132,173 data-driven research, 21,90,153 evidence reviews, 47,72,130 and the ranking of project ideas based on network priorities. 35,99,110,115,132 Networks reported challenges when there were gaps between the interests of research funders and PBRN stakeholders, including divergence between the goals of granting agencies and interests of PBRNs.…”
Section: Methodology Of Prioritizing the Research Agenda And Topics Of Pbrn Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…51,52,[60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75] Later-generation PBRNs demonstrated more specific goals at their establishment, which defined their aims and partnerships. [79][80][81][82][83] We present PBRN goals and aims in Appendix Table 2.…”
Section: Foundationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such approaches created a solid foundation and strong incentive for PBRN research. 39,66,67,69,78,81,82,86,99,105,108,[110][111][112][113][114][115][116][117][118] .…”
Section: Practitioner Participation and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in some cases, professional organizations played this pivotal role. 46,84,120,124,144,[158][159][160] Some PBRNs were affiliated with research institutes, 47,76,158,161 some developed as community-based associations, 81,107,110 in 1 case, without academic affiliation. 111 Other PBRNs had more than 1 linkage, 23,75,90,108,126 of which 1 was a HIT vendor.…”
Section: Initial Partnerships To Establish Pbrns and Centers Of Operationsmentioning
Practice-based research networks (PBRNs) have developed dynamically across the world, paralleling the emergence of the primary care discipline. While this review focuses on the internal environment of PBRNs, the complete framework will be presented incrementally in future publications.Methods: We conducted a scoping review of the published and gray literature. Electronic databases, including MEDLINE (PubMed), OVID, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Scopus, and SAGE Premier, were searched for publications between January 1, 1965 and December 31, 2020 for English-language articles. Rigorous inclusion/exclusion criteria were implemented to identify relevant publications, and inductive thematic analysis was applied to elucidate key elements, subthemes, and themes. Social network theory was used to synthesize findings.Results: A total of 229 publications described the establishment of 93 PBRNs in 15 countries that met the inclusion criteria. The overall framework yielded 3 main themes, 12 subthemes, and 57 key elements. Key PBRN activities included relationship building between academia and practitioners and development of a learning environment through multidirectional communication.Conclusions: PBRNs across many countries contributed significantly to shaping the landscape of primary health care and became an integral part of it. Many common features within the sphere of PBRNs can be identified that seem to promote their establishment across the world.
“…Competing agenda was indicated by statements stressing that practitioner priorities were important. 9,35,96,111,112,122,[170][171][172] In some publications, we also found information about leadership processes for cocreating the research agenda, 81,83,86,99,110,125,132,173 data-driven research, 21,90,153 evidence reviews, 47,72,130 and the ranking of project ideas based on network priorities. 35,99,110,115,132 Networks reported challenges when there were gaps between the interests of research funders and PBRN stakeholders, including divergence between the goals of granting agencies and interests of PBRNs.…”
Section: Methodology Of Prioritizing the Research Agenda And Topics Of Pbrn Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…51,52,[60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75] Later-generation PBRNs demonstrated more specific goals at their establishment, which defined their aims and partnerships. [79][80][81][82][83] We present PBRN goals and aims in Appendix Table 2.…”
Section: Foundationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such approaches created a solid foundation and strong incentive for PBRN research. 39,66,67,69,78,81,82,86,99,105,108,[110][111][112][113][114][115][116][117][118] .…”
Section: Practitioner Participation and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in some cases, professional organizations played this pivotal role. 46,84,120,124,144,[158][159][160] Some PBRNs were affiliated with research institutes, 47,76,158,161 some developed as community-based associations, 81,107,110 in 1 case, without academic affiliation. 111 Other PBRNs had more than 1 linkage, 23,75,90,108,126 of which 1 was a HIT vendor.…”
Section: Initial Partnerships To Establish Pbrns and Centers Of Operationsmentioning
Practice-based research networks (PBRNs) have developed dynamically across the world, paralleling the emergence of the primary care discipline. While this review focuses on the internal environment of PBRNs, the complete framework will be presented incrementally in future publications.Methods: We conducted a scoping review of the published and gray literature. Electronic databases, including MEDLINE (PubMed), OVID, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Scopus, and SAGE Premier, were searched for publications between January 1, 1965 and December 31, 2020 for English-language articles. Rigorous inclusion/exclusion criteria were implemented to identify relevant publications, and inductive thematic analysis was applied to elucidate key elements, subthemes, and themes. Social network theory was used to synthesize findings.Results: A total of 229 publications described the establishment of 93 PBRNs in 15 countries that met the inclusion criteria. The overall framework yielded 3 main themes, 12 subthemes, and 57 key elements. Key PBRN activities included relationship building between academia and practitioners and development of a learning environment through multidirectional communication.Conclusions: PBRNs across many countries contributed significantly to shaping the landscape of primary health care and became an integral part of it. Many common features within the sphere of PBRNs can be identified that seem to promote their establishment across the world.
“…Although the trial did not show significant differences between groups, the findings will inform a future, more optimally powered study. Tyler and Werner 9 share a distinct "prenatal history" of a newly developing community-based PBRN that focuses on developmental disabilities, demonstrating how CTSAfunded shared resources can energize and involve the larger community in practice-based research. Although best practices for handling laboratory test results in primary care have been identified before, 10 West et al 11 revisit this topic in the current environment of electronic tracking systems and compare practices with and without electronic health records (EHRs).…”
Participatory approaches, in which researchers work together with members of the autism community (e.g., autistic people, family members, caregivers, or other stakeholders) to design, conduct, and disseminate research, have become increasingly prominent within the field of autism research over the past decade. Despite growing academic and community interest in conducting participatory studies, stakeholder collaboration remains infrequent in autism research, at least partially due to systemic barriers. To help reduce barriers to engaging in participatory autism research, the International Society for Autism Research (INSAR) Autistic Researchers Committee has launched the INSAR Community Collaborator Request (ICCR; https://www.autism-insar.org/page/iccr), a platform on the INSAR website that allows autism researchers conducting participatory research to seek out stakeholder collaborators from the autism community (including both autistic people and their family members/caregivers, as relevant to a given research project). Interested stakeholders also have the opportunity to subscribe to ICCR posts, allowing them to be alerted of new opportunities for collaboration and potentially increasing their involvement in autism research. Overall, the ICCR provides a venue to connect autism researchers with potential community collaborators, reducing barriers to participatory autism research and increasing the frequency of successful community–academic partnerships within the field. We are hopeful that in the long term, such changes will lead to greater alignment between research outputs and the goals of the greater autism community, and consequently an increase in the overall quality and relevance of autism research.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.