2015
DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt183pd2b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Community, Cosmopolitanism and the Problem of Human Commonality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, focusing on the transnational route to cosmopolitanism also makes it possible to address the criticism often levelled against cosmopolitanism that it is a form of western-values imperialism (Jabri 2007). Yet ethnographic studies show postcolonial perspectives on cosmopolitanism to be a vibrant and existing alternative (Amit & Rapport 2012). Similarly, we argue that transnational citizens can hold cosmopolitan outlooks, irrespective of their national background or personal worldview.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Indeed, focusing on the transnational route to cosmopolitanism also makes it possible to address the criticism often levelled against cosmopolitanism that it is a form of western-values imperialism (Jabri 2007). Yet ethnographic studies show postcolonial perspectives on cosmopolitanism to be a vibrant and existing alternative (Amit & Rapport 2012). Similarly, we argue that transnational citizens can hold cosmopolitan outlooks, irrespective of their national background or personal worldview.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Notwithstanding, I find Levinas's work to be highly provocative. Much of his philosophy appears to chime with the tenets of an anthropology I have claimed concerning the individuality of human embodiment, its 'secret' and private perceptions and world-views (Rapport 1993(Rapport , 1994, and its 'usurpatory' power and freedom to define a life-project (Rapport 2003(Rapport , 2016; also the dual phenomenology of language wherein depths of personal significance feed into superficial public expression (Rapport 1987(Rapport , 1997; also the immorality of a society that categorizes its individual members as essentially representative (of cultures, communities, classes, religions) (Rapport 2012;Amit andRapport 2002, 2012); and also the need for science and morality alike to transcend the narrow (and often erroneous) disciplines of cultures and accede to a human civilization based on rationality, universality and a cosmopolitan politeness (Rapport 2010(Rapport , 2011.…”
Section: The Challenge Of Levinasian Philosophymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, cosmopolitanism is not exclusive to globally mobile people, ‘the travelling elite by no means has the monopoly on openness to Others’ (Radice, 2014: 2). One might stay at home and be a local cosmopolitan, seeking to engage with one’s own otherness; at the same time, one might be highly mobile and yet rarely engage with otherness, remaining in a carefully groomed ‘international bubble,’ an expression used to denote the secluded environment in which many foreigners or ‘expatriates’ live, sheltered from the locality in which they reside temporarily (Amit and Rapport, 2012; Fechter, 2007).…”
Section: Cosmopolitanism: An Old But Timely Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%