Agroforestry for Degraded Landscapes 2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-4136-0_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Community-Based Peat Swamp Restoration Through Agroforestry in Indonesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They can also be employed to reclaim eroded and degraded land [59][60][61]. Local communities in the Indonesian archipelago possess the knowledge to use many traditional local tree garden-repong damar, simpukng and tembawang agroforestry systems as climate-smart farming, to manage ecosystems and restore degraded land [15]. Considering the high costs involved in land restoration (approximately 260 USD to 2880 USD ha −1 , depending on the restoration method used and the condition of land) and global concern for large-scale restoration [27,62,63], involving communities through their agroforestry practices can have low-cost potential (approximately $181 US to $402 US ha −1 , see also Rahman et al [21]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They can also be employed to reclaim eroded and degraded land [59][60][61]. Local communities in the Indonesian archipelago possess the knowledge to use many traditional local tree garden-repong damar, simpukng and tembawang agroforestry systems as climate-smart farming, to manage ecosystems and restore degraded land [15]. Considering the high costs involved in land restoration (approximately 260 USD to 2880 USD ha −1 , depending on the restoration method used and the condition of land) and global concern for large-scale restoration [27,62,63], involving communities through their agroforestry practices can have low-cost potential (approximately $181 US to $402 US ha −1 , see also Rahman et al [21]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agroforestry can be an important FLR approach with the potential to restore degraded land by reestablishing ecological processes, structures and ecosystem functions, while also enabling economic returns and the maintenance of livelihoods, local knowledge, and culture [12]. Agroforestry-based restoration projects across the tropics have been documented vividly by a number of scientific studies from Brazil to Mozambique and Indonesia [13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), mangosteen (Garcinia mangostana), Nipah (Nypa fruticans Wurmb), pineapple (ananas comosus), and banana (Musa paradisiaca) varieties are food-producing plants adapted to wet conditions or low-drainage peat swamp areas (Tata and Susmianto 2016; Uda et al 2020). As these foods are more likely to be culturally familiar, the use of such plants in agroforestry systems is also more likely to be accepted by local farmers, provided that they increase farmers' livelihoods, food security and nutrition (Samsudin et al 2020). Complex agroforestry systems can have physiognomy and structures similar to natural forests (de Foresta et al 2000;Murniati 2020), thus avoiding debate over whether land should be used for forestry or food production.…”
Section: The Way Forward?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pangan tersebut lebih familiar secara budaya, dan pemanfaatan tanaman tersebut dalam sistem agroforestri juga lebih mudah diterima oleh petani lokal, selama bisa meningkatkan penghasilan, serta ketahanan pangan dan gizi (Samsudin et al 2020). Sistem agroforestri kompleks bisa memiliki kontur lahan dan struktur yang mirip dengan hutan alami (de Foresta et al 2000; Murniati 2020), sehingga dapat menghindari perselisihan terkait fungsi lahan hutan atau produksi pangan.…”
Section: Bagaimana Upaya Ke Depan?unclassified