PsycEXTRA Dataset 2004
DOI: 10.1037/e439622005-001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Community-based Participatory Research: Assessing the Evidence: Evidence Report/Technology Assessment, Number 99

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
898
0
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 654 publications
(919 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
14
898
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Working collaboratively with members of the community not only during the recruitment period, but throughout the entire research process, is an approach used in Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR), which has generally been shown to raise participation rates and increase the value of studies for both researchers and the community (Viswanathan et al, 2004). CBPR, an overarching term for a variety of approaches such as action research, participatory action research, mutual inquiry and feminist participatory research (Minkler & Wallerstein, 2008), involves working with communities, instead of in them, and attempts to strengthen the problem-solving capacity of communities through collective engagement in the research process (Viswanathan et al, 2004). This approach acts not as a community outreach strategy but as a systematic effort to incorporate community participation and decision-making into the research process (Wallerstein & Duran, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Working collaboratively with members of the community not only during the recruitment period, but throughout the entire research process, is an approach used in Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR), which has generally been shown to raise participation rates and increase the value of studies for both researchers and the community (Viswanathan et al, 2004). CBPR, an overarching term for a variety of approaches such as action research, participatory action research, mutual inquiry and feminist participatory research (Minkler & Wallerstein, 2008), involves working with communities, instead of in them, and attempts to strengthen the problem-solving capacity of communities through collective engagement in the research process (Viswanathan et al, 2004). This approach acts not as a community outreach strategy but as a systematic effort to incorporate community participation and decision-making into the research process (Wallerstein & Duran, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A commonly used approach for minority health promotion is community-based participatory research (CBPR) (Yancey, et al, 2004), a process characterized by a long-term cooperative engagement by researchers and community members as equal contributors to the process (Minkler & Wallerstein, 2002;Viswanathan, et al, 2004) The main principles and characteristics of CBPR include: (1) recognizing the community as a unit of identity, (2) emphasizing local relevance of public health problems and ecological perspectives that recognize and attend to the multiple determinants of health and disease, (3) facilitating collaborative partnerships and promoting co-learning and capacity building among all partners, (4) integrating and achieving a balance between research and action for the mutual benefit of all partners, (5) building on strengths and resources within the community, and (6) disseminating findings and knowledge gained to all partners and involving all partners in the dissemination process (Minkler & Wallerstein, 2002). This approach emphasizes community participation as an important outcome in the overall process (Viswanathan, et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach emphasizes community participation as an important outcome in the overall process (Viswanathan, et al, 2004). A CBPR approach often results in more sustainable, culturally sensitive community programs and greater support from community members resulting in the empowerment of the community for health-related issues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we argue that engaging citizens and communities in data collection processes does not necessarily hinder data quality when protocols, methodologies and analyses are undertaken in a robust manner. When undertaken with explicit attention to quality assurance, such processes can, in fact, enhance both quality of data and research by establishing mutual trust, ownership and culturally appropriate measurement instruments (Esmail et al 2015;Viswanathan et al 2004). …”
Section: Engage Citizens and Communities To Generate Evidence And Finmentioning
confidence: 99%