2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2015.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communicative efficiency in language production: Optional case-marking in Japanese

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
88
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 140 publications
4
88
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also possible that the hypothesized shift from SOV to SVO is restricted to situations where case marking is completely ambiguous and inefficient to disambiguate the interpretation of reversible events. Alternatively, related communicative efficiency accounts that do not attribute confusability primarily to argument order confusion (e.g., Fedzechkina, Jaeger, & Newport, 2012) predict SVO order in cases when the properties of the arguments would make OSV a plausible alternative order (Kurumada & Jaeger, 2013). This is compatible with our results.…”
Section: Why Verb-medial Responses?supporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is also possible that the hypothesized shift from SOV to SVO is restricted to situations where case marking is completely ambiguous and inefficient to disambiguate the interpretation of reversible events. Alternatively, related communicative efficiency accounts that do not attribute confusability primarily to argument order confusion (e.g., Fedzechkina, Jaeger, & Newport, 2012) predict SVO order in cases when the properties of the arguments would make OSV a plausible alternative order (Kurumada & Jaeger, 2013). This is compatible with our results.…”
Section: Why Verb-medial Responses?supporting
confidence: 88%
“…This hypothesis has been supported by data from English, German and Russian (Arnon, Snider, Hofmeister, Jaeger, & Sag, 2006;Kempe & MacWhinney, 1999;MacWhinney & Bates, 1989;Temperly & Gidea, 2010) and by data from an artificial language learning study (Fedzechkina et al, 2012). As sentence word order freedom increases, its informativity about the underlying syntactic structure might decrease (Fedzechkina, Jaeger, & Newport, 2013;Kurumada & Jaeger, 2013) and therefore the impact of constituent length on sentence word order might lessen as a result. Hence, English, Japanese and Korean speakers generally shifted word order more often than Basque speakers because word order is a significantly less reliable processing cue in Basque than in the other languages.…”
Section: The Competition Model: a Trade-off Between Processing Facilimentioning
confidence: 94%
“…An alternative view holds that even these highly automatic processes Kurumada & Jaeger, 2013 ). Similarly, optional function words have been found to be more likely to be produced when the constituent they introduce is unexpected in context (e.g., Jaeger, 2010Jaeger, , 2011Wasow et al, 2011 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond documenting these forces, an important ongoing research goal is to identify why production choices have this character. We see at least part of the answer in the inherent difficulty of language production, as described in the Production-DistributionComprehension framework (PDC; MacDonald, 2013), which hypothesizes that producers make implicit choices of utterance forms that minimize production difficulty (for related claims for production efficiency, see Kurumada & Jaeger, 2015). The repeated pairings of events, words, and structures seen in the current studies are examples of Plan Reuse in this framework, where previously-uttered forms become easier as a function of implicit learning over past production and comprehension events (e.g., Chang, 2009).…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%