DOI: 10.17771/pucrio.acad.27060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communicative Dimensions of Application Programming Interfaces (Apis)

Abstract: First and foremost, I am grateful to my wife, Elen, for the love and patience during all these years of hard work. Many thanks to my family, especially my mother, for the love, support and encouragement.I would like to thank my thesis advisor, Prof. Clarisse Sieckenius de Souza, for the dedication, insight, patience and for the always sharp comments, suggestions and questions about my work. I am also grateful to her for willing to advise me when I was already in the course of my PhD years. It has been a privil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 48 publications
(84 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, we applied the communicability breakdown tags of the Semiotic Engineering's Communicability Evaluation Method (CEM) [47] to interpret and organize the results. The use of CEM tags (and the breakdown categories that they correspond to) to characterize breakdowns in different contexts than originally proposed has already been done by Afonso [50] in studies of APIs communicability. Their evocative phrasing, representing deeper analytic categories, is helpful to reveal an immediate sense of recurring situations users face when interacting with the technology.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, we applied the communicability breakdown tags of the Semiotic Engineering's Communicability Evaluation Method (CEM) [47] to interpret and organize the results. The use of CEM tags (and the breakdown categories that they correspond to) to characterize breakdowns in different contexts than originally proposed has already been done by Afonso [50] in studies of APIs communicability. Their evocative phrasing, representing deeper analytic categories, is helpful to reveal an immediate sense of recurring situations users face when interacting with the technology.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%