Communication within archaeology: Do we understand each other?

Venclová, Natalie

doi:10.1177/1461957108095985

Cited by 14 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Until the 1980s, Differences in language abilities have consequences beyond problems of accessing datasets and dissemination. As Meyer and Crumley (this volume) note, and Venclová (2007) has discussed elsewhere, the nuances of language have particular significance in understanding theoretical concepts and are embedded in linguistic nuances and references of which only other native speakers are aware. In addition, the current fragmentation of archaeological research in to linguistic spheres (such as those on GIS, geophysics and theory)…”

Section: Internationalismmentioning

confidence: 90%

Atlantic Europe in the First Millennium BC

Moore¹,

Armada²

2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Throughout, these chapters provide a plurality of theoretical approaches, techniques and methodologies representing a cross section of current research in Western Europe. The intention of this volume is not to espouse a particular theoretical paradigm or represent a coherent singular narrative, but instead to illustrate the variation in approaches whilst fostering dialogue and comparison between regions, research traditions and theoretical stances. The volume is, we hope, just one step along a path to increased dialogue and engagement within and between European first millennium BC studies. Bringing together such a volume is a complex task and we are extremely grateful for the advice and support provided by a number of colleagues, in particular Colin Haselgrove, Richard Hingley and Margarita Díaz-Andreu. We are also extremely grateful to a range of anonymous expert referees who graciously gave their time to read and comment on each of the contributions and to two anonymous referees who gave helpful advice on the original proposal for the volume. The conference, from which this volume has developed, was held at

show abstract

Section: Internationalismmentioning

confidence: 90%

Atlantic Europe in the First Millennium BC

Moore¹,

Armada²

2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Ao pensarmos no grande público, um dos meios de divulgação patrimonial mais importante é a mídia em todos os seus formatos, e para o patrimônio arqueológico esta é uma problemática debatida em publicações acadêmicas nacionais e internacionais (BENZ, LIEDMEIER, 2007; DIAS, DELFINA, TEGA-CALIPPO, FERREIRA, GUIMARÃES, CAMARGO, 2013;FOWLER, 2007;HARDING, 2007;HOLTORF, 2007;SCHERZLER, 2007;TEGA-CALIPPO 2012;VENCLOVÁ 2007; entre outros).…”

Section: Turismo Arqueologia E Mídiaunclassified

‘Vai aparecer no jornal!’: o papel imprensa na divulgação arqueológica no Pará

Godoy¹,

Barroso²

2020

Cad. LEPAARQ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Arqueologia é um tema de interesse da mídia por diversos motivos. Entretanto, nem sempre a exposição do assunto é adequada para fins de divulgação científica, seguindo um padrão que coloca o tema mais enquanto empecilho para obras de infraestrutura, curiosidade e até como entretenimento. Em pesquisa nos dois jornais locais de maior expressão em Belém, no Pará, no período entre 2008 e 2015, percebemos qual o lugar da arqueologia na imprensa desta metrópole amazônica. Em Belém a arqueologia está em uma miríade de lugares de turismo e lazer, característica que não se refletiu em sua divulgação nas mídias analisadas. Concluímos que a arqueologia deixa de utilizar a mídia como importante ferramenta de divulgação científica. Abstract: Archeology is a topic of interest to the media for several reasons. However, the exposition of the subject is not always adequate for the purpose of scientific divulgation, following a pattern that places the theme more as an obstacle for infrastructure works, or as curiosity and even as entertainment. As we analyzed the two most important local newspapers in Belém, Pará, between 2008 and 2015, we could reflect upon the place of archeology in an Amazonian metropolis through its local press. In Belém, archeology is represented in all tourism and leisure spaces, a characteristic that was not reflected in the analyzed media. We conclude that archeology sub utilizes the media as an important tool for scientific dissemination.

show abstract

“…Using the language of the discourse community assures readers, particularly more powerful ones, that the individuals involved in the discourse view knowledge from the same philosophical and ideological perspective which facilitates the exchange of ideas (Suchan & Dulek, 1990). Recent research on discourse communities explores the way values, assumptions, and methods shared by readers and writers in a given community affect the type and nature of communication produced and accepted by both the readers and writers in that community (e.g., Melville, 2008;Mostafa & Street, 2009;Venclova, 2007). If the organizations in the three sectors comprise separate discourse communities, the transfer of PMS innovations will be challenging.…”

Section: Transfer Of Pe1forma11ce Meas11reme11t Sptems 29mentioning

confidence: 99%