2001
DOI: 10.28945/2356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communication In Complex Information System Development Projects

Abstract: C Co om mm mu un ni ic ca at ti io on n IIn n C Co om mp pl le ex x I In nf fo or rm ma at ti io on n S

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[4] equal commented [5] and refuted [6] flaws identified [7] equal open letter to the scientific community [8] counterexamples given [9] equal published, but indirectly refuted by [10], implied flaws [11], [12] equal studied and refuted by other scientists [13] flaws identified [14] equal studied in [15] refuted [16] equal patent applied patent granted [17] equal replied in [18] and rebuttal in [19] rebuttal not commented so far [20] equal published without official review [21] not officially verified [22] equal refuted by [6] refuted [23] equal appeared in the Southwest Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics (discontinued) reviewed [24] equal appeared reviewed [25] equal published reviewed [26] equal Published as a book by WorldScientific reviewed [27] equal published reviewed [28] equal published reviewed [29] equal refuted by [30] refuted [31] not equal underwent a peer review, but was felt not convincing published, but has negative reviews [22] not equal refuted by [32] refuted [33] not equal published in the Journal ISRN Computational Mathematics 2012 ID: 321372, 1-15 not found on the web, only on arxiv [34] not equal refuted by [35] flaws identified [36] not equal refuted by [37] flaws identified [38] not equal retracted (by the author) flaws identified [39] not equal discussed intensively online (by experts) issues identified but left unresolved…”
Section: Ref Claim Scientific Attention Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4] equal commented [5] and refuted [6] flaws identified [7] equal open letter to the scientific community [8] counterexamples given [9] equal published, but indirectly refuted by [10], implied flaws [11], [12] equal studied and refuted by other scientists [13] flaws identified [14] equal studied in [15] refuted [16] equal patent applied patent granted [17] equal replied in [18] and rebuttal in [19] rebuttal not commented so far [20] equal published without official review [21] not officially verified [22] equal refuted by [6] refuted [23] equal appeared in the Southwest Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics (discontinued) reviewed [24] equal appeared reviewed [25] equal published reviewed [26] equal Published as a book by WorldScientific reviewed [27] equal published reviewed [28] equal published reviewed [29] equal refuted by [30] refuted [31] not equal underwent a peer review, but was felt not convincing published, but has negative reviews [22] not equal refuted by [32] refuted [33] not equal published in the Journal ISRN Computational Mathematics 2012 ID: 321372, 1-15 not found on the web, only on arxiv [34] not equal refuted by [35] flaws identified [36] not equal refuted by [37] flaws identified [38] not equal retracted (by the author) flaws identified [39] not equal discussed intensively online (by experts) issues identified but left unresolved…”
Section: Ref Claim Scientific Attention Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the information requirements determination stage, where the majority of communication problems arise (Hutinski, Vrcek, & Bubas, 2001), the IT professional is trying to gain domain knowledge, most of which is new information. Reminding oneself of the importance of this phase and the potential downstream problems that can be avoided by effective listening, should provide an incentive to overlook what the IT listener may perceive as the speaker's unpolished delivery or unfamiliarity with technical terms.…”
Section: Effective Listening Skillsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focus of the communication components in the IT curriculum has been on presentation skills (Janczewski, 2001). Presentation skills can address the problem of end-users having difficulty understanding IT professionals (Hutinski, Vrcek, & Bubas, 2001). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%