Communication Engineering

Mass measurements ofMg22andSi26via theParikh1, Caggiano2, Deibel3 et al. 2005Phys. Rev. C350530View full textAdd to dashboardCite

“…Tritons corresponding to the ground and first excited states of 26 Si are clearly seen, along with contaminant peaks from the 12 C(p,t) 10 C and 16 O(p,t) 14 O reactions (leading to the ground states of 10 C and 14 O, respectively). Figure 2(b) shows the triton momentum spectrum from the 24 Mg(p,t) 22 Mg reaction at 15 • ; again, we see the contaminant 12 C(p,t) and 16 Ref [14] Ref [16] Ref [17] Ref [18] Refs [12,13] Refs [12,19] Refs [12,20] triton spectra at 25 • were similar to those at 15 • . Both Gaussian and Lorentzian functions were used for peak fitting, and they gave identical results (although the Gaussian fit gave the better reduced χ 2 ).…”

“…Hence, the same momentum calibration can be used to determine the Q 0 value of both the 28 Si(p,t) 26 Si and 24 Mg(p,t) 22 Mg reactions. 1990 compilation [13] 5713.9(1.2) New ANL measurement [19] 5711.0(1.0) New ORNL measurement [20] 5709.3(3.…”

“…This prompted a reexamination of an earlier determination of the 22 Mg mass [15,16], two high-precision studies of the mass of this nucleus using Penning traps [17,18], and two new γ -ray measurements of the excitation energy of this state [19,20]. These results are summarized in Tables I and II and Fig.…”

Introduction to the Thessalonian Correspondences

“…Peroratio (3:16-18). 42 Robert Jewett's analysis of the purpose behind the writing of 2 Thessalonians, and the choice of the rhetoric utilized, is on target: 2 Thessalonians is a tightly organized deliberative letter with a combination of reproof, denial, and encouragement that reveals a complex situation of misunderstanding a previous piece of correspondence that had attempted to deal with apocalyptic confusions and congregational disorders.v But exactly what was that "misunderstanding," and who was behind it? To those questions we now tum.…”