Communication and the Narrative Basis of Sustainability: Observations from the Municipal Water Sector

Abstract

Numerous studies attempt to operationalize sustainability and seek to characterize objective, or at least standardized, metrics of sustainable conditions and/or operations. In this paper, we suggest that sustainability is better viewed as an emergent quality, defined in terms of specific institutions and situations. Observations from the water sector suggest that sustainability is not merely a matter of -bolting on technologies‖, but a complex synthesis of institutional factors, social value perspectives, technologies and engineered artifacts, and natural or environmental conditions. The pursuit of sustainability appears to involve a process of broad-scale organizational transformation, a transformation that can vary significantly from utility to utility. Owing to this contingent quality, we suggest that sustainability is productively understood as a narrative construct. We illustrate how two types of discourse are particularly critical to the establishment and perpetuation of meaningful sustainability programs in water utilities and municipalities: (1) constitutive discourse, which frames and enables new ways of conceiving a particular state of affairs; and (2) transactional discourse, which provides a medium for participatory deliberation and enables the sharing of instructions and information necessary to carry out a transformation from the status quo to an envisioned future state. Although physio-chemical properties, ecological processes and thresholds, and technological factors must inform deliberations, we suggest that the realization of sustainability is at base a narrative enterprise. Observations articulated in this essay were derived through an ensemble research approach including a targeted literature review, a three-phase survey of 18 U.S. water utilities, and a workshop with water sector professionals, regulators, and experts in sustainability and organizational change. OPEN ACCESS

Assessing the Sustainability of High-Value Brands in the IT Sector

“…Despite this growing amount of attention being paid to both the academic and business communities, models to analyze and evaluate online sustainability communication have not yet been developed [53]. However, it is important to communicate the commitment to corporate sustainability to stakeholders because a sustainable business approach cannot be implemented without effective communication, which aims to share CSR values with stakeholders [54].…”

Communicating Sustainability: An Operational Model for Evaluating Corporate Websites

“…Over recent decades, the growing interest in corporate sustainability (CS), which is considered "a complex synthesis of institutional factors, social value perspectives, technologies and engineered artifacts, and natural or environmental conditions" [1] (p. 4432), has gradually taken over debates in both academia and business [2,3]. The need for organizations to achieve sustainable development and meet the stakeholders' expectations is generating dramatic changes in policies and business practices.…”

Sustainability as Cognitive “Friction”: A Narrative Approach to Understand the Moral Dissonance of Sustainability and Harmonization Strategies

“…But what are the principles and techniques that promote and govern processes of deliberation that individuals, as well as collectives, use to understand complex systems so that they can make informed decisions while confronting multiple, and sometimes, conflicting objectives (Stern, 2005)? Recommendations are deliberations on available scientific data and information, transparency of processes and value orientation and interest (Herrick and Pratt, 2013). With a cultural approach, sensemaking processes happen on an individual level as "intellectual refinement associated with arts, philosophy and learning" (du Gay et al, 1997, p. 11); sustainability is part of culture today through which we all understand and interprete the world .…”

“…Focusing on the individual's perception of sustainability, and their understanding of related-complex-normative frameworks influencing their social practices, we have to acknowledge multiple and sometimes conflicting objectives that individuals are confronted with (Stern, 2005;Herrick and Pratt, 2013) as well as cultural factors that are related to and influence a specific behavior. Sustainability is a complex issue and individuals are bombarded with an abundance of information regarding it; it is the culture as well as the cultural identity of an individual which decides the way of behavior-as well as the evaluation of this behavior.…”