2017
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1617526114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communicating the deadly consequences of global warming for human heat stress

Abstract: In December of 2015, the international community pledged to limit global warming to below 2°C above preindustrial (PI) to prevent dangerous climate change. However, to what extent, and for whom, is danger avoided if this ambitious target is realized? We address these questions by scrutinizing heat stress, because the frequency of extremely hot weather is expected to continue to rise in the approach to the 2°C limit. We use analogs and the extreme South Asian heat of 2015 as a focusing event to help interpret t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
205
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 221 publications
(213 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(35 reference statements)
6
205
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that these observed evidences should only be considered as conservative inferences regarding differential influences of 1.5 and 2°C global warming, accounting for potential presence of strong nonlinear responses at higher warming levels (Dosio & Fischer, 2018;Fischer & Knutti, 2015;Matthews et al, 2017). Therefore, model-based efforts, involving both dedicated experiments for equilibrium warming levels and existing transient scenarios passing through 1.5 and 2°C, are still warranted to quantify added risks due to the future 0.5°C difference, at both regional and global scales.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that these observed evidences should only be considered as conservative inferences regarding differential influences of 1.5 and 2°C global warming, accounting for potential presence of strong nonlinear responses at higher warming levels (Dosio & Fischer, 2018;Fischer & Knutti, 2015;Matthews et al, 2017). Therefore, model-based efforts, involving both dedicated experiments for equilibrium warming levels and existing transient scenarios passing through 1.5 and 2°C, are still warranted to quantify added risks due to the future 0.5°C difference, at both regional and global scales.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some recent studies have considered only maximum temperature to define the heat index ( HI ) without accounting for humidity, for example (Dong et al, ; Harrington & Otto, ; Liu et al, ), evidence suggests that humidity plays an important role in temperature discomfort and dangerous heat and thus must be integrated into the construction of the HI (Coffel et al, ; Davis et al, ; Matthews et al, ; Mora et al, ), particularly in South America, Africa, and South Asia (Russo et al, ). Various heat metrics that include both temperature and humidity have been developed over the past few years, all performing well and rather similarly (Anderson et al, ; Matthews et al, ). Here we employed the apparent temperature ( AT ) and defined the annual HI as being the number of days for which the daily maximum AT exceeds a given threshold, being set at 105 °F (i.e., 40.6 °C).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we employed the apparent temperature ( AT ) and defined the annual HI as being the number of days for which the daily maximum AT exceeds a given threshold, being set at 105 °F (i.e., 40.6 °C). The latter is based on the U.S. National Weather Services (NWS) threshold of dangerous heat, widely used in the literature (e.g., Matthews et al, ; Russo et al, ). Although a fixed threshold was preferred to a relative threshold for the main exposure analysis—to ensure the consistency with past studies—we also explored future extreme heat using relative thresholds, set as the 95th, 97.5th, and 99th percentiles of the historical local maximum AT .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such an assessment is even more urgent considering that recent empirical estimates show that the global mean air temperature is nonlinearly related to heat stress. In other words, the same future warming as realized to date could trigger larger increases in human heat stress and associated health impacts than historically experienced (Matthews, Wilby, and Murphy 2017).…”
Section: Heat Burden In Citiesmentioning
confidence: 92%