1996
DOI: 10.1086/209473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communicating Price Information through Semantic Cues: The Moderating Effects of Situation and Discount Size

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
128
0
6

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
11
128
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, past research has demonstrated that just the use of semantic phrases or indications of sales can further stimulate consumers' interest (Inman, McAlister, and Hoyer, 1990) and further enhance the effectiveness of these promotions. However, retailers need to be careful of what cues are used as past research demonstrates the effectiveness of these semantic cues (e.g., regular price/sale price; price vs. compare atl sale price) are contingent on the discount size and consumers' shopping interest level (search vs. evaluation) (see Grewal, Marmorstein, and Sharma, 1996).…”
Section: Retail Price Promotional Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, past research has demonstrated that just the use of semantic phrases or indications of sales can further stimulate consumers' interest (Inman, McAlister, and Hoyer, 1990) and further enhance the effectiveness of these promotions. However, retailers need to be careful of what cues are used as past research demonstrates the effectiveness of these semantic cues (e.g., regular price/sale price; price vs. compare atl sale price) are contingent on the discount size and consumers' shopping interest level (search vs. evaluation) (see Grewal, Marmorstein, and Sharma, 1996).…”
Section: Retail Price Promotional Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marketers frequently make use of semantic cues (Grewal et al, 1996) (Craig, 2001), is also an example of this type of semantic cue. The third type of semantic cue for price promotions could compare an existing price with a future (higher) price.…”
Section: Semantic Cuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary dependent variables measured persuasion by measuring product evaluation and intention to buy on 9-point scales that were adapted from Grewal, Marmorstein, and Sharma (1996), and modified for the specific scenario. The coefficient alphas for the two scales were 0.92 and 0.94, respectively, and the scales are presented in Appendix A.…”
Section: Study Dependent Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%