2013
DOI: 10.1017/s0890060413000048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communicating actionable user research for human-centered design

Abstract: In human-centered design, user research drives design decisions by providing an understanding of end users. In practice, different people, teams, or even companies manage each step of the design process, making communication of user research results a critical activity. Based on an empirical study of current methods used by experts, this paper presents strategies for effectively communicating user research findings across organizational or corporate boundaries. To build researcher–client relationships, underst… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We consider two key reasons for the lower impact of research results on knowledge construction. First, while Roschuni et al (), Sleeswijk Visser et al () and Töre Yargin and Erbuğ () explain the inspirational character of research results, our findings indicate that they are rather more didactic. Designers' comments included references to results as a resource for (1) confirming design problems, (2) providing guidelines, (3) defining the evaluation criteria for the project and (4) remembering to consider the user while developing solutions.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We consider two key reasons for the lower impact of research results on knowledge construction. First, while Roschuni et al (), Sleeswijk Visser et al () and Töre Yargin and Erbuğ () explain the inspirational character of research results, our findings indicate that they are rather more didactic. Designers' comments included references to results as a resource for (1) confirming design problems, (2) providing guidelines, (3) defining the evaluation criteria for the project and (4) remembering to consider the user while developing solutions.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…When researchers (either in‐house or outsourced) are responsible for conducting research, they become the mediators in the UCD process (Waisberg, ) and transfer their findings from the field to designers through deliverables and interaction. However, under such conditions, the effectiveness of the deliverables (Kumar, ; Mattelmäki, Brandt, & Vaajakallio, ; Roschuni et al, ; Sleeswijk Visser et al, ), changes in understanding based on the differences between professional mental models (Badke‐Schaub, Neumann, Lauche, & Mohammed, ), and the ways of overcoming communication problems between stakeholders (van Veggel, ), are still under discussion. Furthermore, this division of labour also has the disadvantage of bringing a disconnect to design teams' understanding of the user and her needs.…”
Section: The Role Of Research In Contemporary Design Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such differences can diminish the benefits of user research by limiting the extent of empathy that designers can establish with the user. To maintain empathy and ensure a shared understanding of the findings of user research, the researcher should get to know the designer and their work context, and then plan the means of communication of the findings (Roschuni et al, 2013). In this way, the barrier between user researchers and designers can be breached.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Katzenbach and Smith [12] define a team as "a small number of people with complementary skills who are committed to a common purpose, set of performance goals, and approach for which they hold themselves mutually accountable". While interdisciplinary collaboration for innovation is highly encouraged [13], communication among members in a design team, group, or company is often quite fragile [14,15,16]. Kim et al [17,18] identify significant gaps of understanding between parties working on design within an organization in defining shared project goals and directions associated with roadmapping.…”
Section: Team Communication Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%