2018 IEEE 14th International Colloquium on Signal Processing &Amp; Its Applications (CSPA) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/cspa.2018.8368687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Common sport activity recognition using inertial sensor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Medical Fitness Security Wu et al [86] Chen et al [89] Zebin et al [92] Ordóñez et al [96] Neverova et al [101] Zhen et al [104] Chen et al [105] Camps et al [108] Gharani et al [109] McGinnis et al [111] Zhao et al [116] Murad et al [119] Dehzangi et al [128] Steffan et al [130] Almaslukh et al [131] Cheng et al [133] Zdravevski et al [136] Abdulhay et al [137] Gadaleta et al [139] Xia et al [142] Asuncion et al [144] Huang et al [146] Aicha et al [147] Rescio et al [150] Hsieh et al [151] Putra et al [153] Ghazali et al [154] Rastegari et al [155] Gurchiek et al [159] Zhang et al [162] Abujrida et al [165] Kim et al [167] Wang et al [168]…”
Section: Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Medical Fitness Security Wu et al [86] Chen et al [89] Zebin et al [92] Ordóñez et al [96] Neverova et al [101] Zhen et al [104] Chen et al [105] Camps et al [108] Gharani et al [109] McGinnis et al [111] Zhao et al [116] Murad et al [119] Dehzangi et al [128] Steffan et al [130] Almaslukh et al [131] Cheng et al [133] Zdravevski et al [136] Abdulhay et al [137] Gadaleta et al [139] Xia et al [142] Asuncion et al [144] Huang et al [146] Aicha et al [147] Rescio et al [150] Hsieh et al [151] Putra et al [153] Ghazali et al [154] Rastegari et al [155] Gurchiek et al [159] Zhang et al [162] Abujrida et al [165] Kim et al [167] Wang et al [168]…”
Section: Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these added complexities, our approach obtained similar performance to what reported by the literature as the current state of the art. Ghazali et al ( 2018 ) achieved 91.2% accuracy in tracking several common sporting activities such as walking, sporting, jogging sprinting and jumping. Using wearable sensors and SVM/kNN methods, Mannini and Sabatini ( 2010 ) were able to distinguish between elementary physical activities such as standing, sitting, lying, walking, climbing and identify activities within sequences of sitting-standing-walking-standing-sitting with an accuracy between 97.8 and 98.3%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of tracking, identifying and classifying human actions has received increasing interest over the years, as it plays a key role in many applied contexts, such as human-computer interface (Popoola and Wang, 2012 ; Sarig Bahat et al, 2015 ; Quitadamo et al, 2017 ; Bachmann et al, 2018 ), daily-life activity monitoring (Mannini and Sabatini, 2010 ; Cheng et al, 2015 ; Chetty and White, 2016 ), clinical assessment (Rawashdeh et al, 2016 ; Arifoglu and Bouchachia, 2017 ; Howell et al, 2017 ) and sports performance (Attal et al, 2015 ; Ghazali et al, 2018 ; Hsu et al, 2018 ). The development of unobtrusive technologies for motion capture (e.g., wearable inertial measurement units—IMUs), their widespread integration in relatively cheap, commercially available devices (e.g., smartphones, watches, activity trackers, heart rate monitors, sensorized insoles), and the push toward healthier, more active life styles, have generated a multitude of existing and potential applications where automatic movement classification and assessment is fundamental (Attal et al, 2015 ; Cheng et al, 2015 ; Cust et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CLA had been used in classifying civet coffee with the highest accuracy of 86.5% obtained by both the quadratic support vector machine and the fine Gaussian support vector machine [7]. CLA has been used in common sports recognition using inertial sensor with 91.2% accuracy [8]. CLA has been used for classification of coffee bean species and 95.6 % accuracy was achieved using the Bagged Trees classifier [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%