Common or distinct pathways to psychosis? A systematic review of evidence from prospective studies for developmental risk factors and antecedents of the schizophrenia spectrum disorders and affective psychoses

Abstract

BackgroundIdentifying the unique and shared premorbid indicators of risk for the schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) and affective psychoses (AP) may refine aetiological hypotheses and inform the delivery of universal versus targeted preventive interventions. This systematic review synthesises the available evidence concerning developmental risk factors and antecedents of SSD and AP to identify those with the most robust support, and to highlight remaining evidence gaps.MethodsA systematic search of prospective birth, population, high-risk, and case-control cohorts was conducted in Medline and supplemented by hand searching, incorporating published studies in English with full text available. Inclusion/exclusion decisions and data extraction were completed in duplicate. Exposures included three categories of risk factors and four categories of antecedents, with case and comparison groups defined by adult psychiatric diagnosis. Effect sizes and prevalence rates were extracted, where available, and the strength of evidence synthesised and evaluated qualitatively across the study designs.ResultsOf 1775 studies identified by the search, 127 provided data to the review. Individuals who develop SSD experience a diversity of subtle premorbid developmental deficits and risk exposures, spanning the prenatal period through early adolescence. Those of greatest magnitude (or observed most consistently) included obstetric complications, maternal illness during pregnancy (especially infections), other maternal physical factors, negative family emotional environment, psychopathology and psychotic symptoms, and cognitive and motor dysfunctions. Relatively less evidence has accumulated to implicate this diversity of exposures in AP, and many yet remain unexamined, with the most consistent or strongest evidence to date being for obstetric complications, psychopathology, cognitive indicators and motor dysfunction. Among the few investigations affording direct comparison between SSD and AP, larger effect sizes and a greater number of significant associations are commonly reported for SSD relative to AP.ConclusionsShared risk factors for SSD and AP may include obstetric complications, childhood psychopathology, cognitive markers and motor dysfunction, but the capacity to distinguish common versus distinct risk factors/antecedents for SSD and AP is limited by the scant availability of prospective data for AP, and inconsistency in replication. Further studies considering both diagnoses concurrently are needed. Nonetheless, the prevalence of the risk factors/antecedents observed in cases and controls helps demarcate potential targets for preventative interventions for these disorders.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12888-015-0562-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A comparison of the cumulative incidence and early risk factors for psychotic disorder in young adults in the Northern Finland Birth Cohorts 1966 and 1986

“…A higher incidence of psychosis across the lifespan among males than females has been reported (Kleinhaus et al 2011) and previous studies on gender differences in onset age focus primarily on schizophrenia rather than other psychoses (Gureje, 1991). Many risk factors are non-specific for schizophrenia and overlap with other psychotic and psychiatric disorders (Laursen et al 2007), but this area requires further investigation (Laurens et al 2015). Still, there seems to be lack of studies on consistency of early risk factors in the same geographical region over time.…”

What causes psychosis? An umbrella review of risk and protective factors

“…With this in mind, in this study we adopted a pragmatic approach and used the term "non-purely genetic factors" to define socio-demographic, parental, perinatal, later factors and antecedents [7][8][9] that may increase (risk factors) or decrease (protective factors) the likelihood of developing psychotic disorders. The clinical importance of investigating these factors is threefold.…”

Do adverse perinatal events predict mortality in schizophrenia during midlife?

“…Furthermore, birth complications in men have predicted mortality in psychoses (Fazel et al 2014). Because deviances in environment in early life are risk factors for schizophrenia (Laurens et al 2015;Matheson et al 2011), it is important to study whether they also predict prognosis of psychoses.…”