2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsc.2019.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Common Complications in Rhytidectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…29,36 Injury to the greater auricular nerve is the most common nerve injury, and injury to the marginal mandibular nerve is the most common motor nerve injury. 33,34,37 Infections and deep vein thrombosis are both rare in face lift surgery, but are serious problems when encountered. 37,38 The data are not clear on what techniques are associated with worse safety profiles, but it does appear that certain techniques are associated with particular complications.…”
Section: Faceliftmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…29,36 Injury to the greater auricular nerve is the most common nerve injury, and injury to the marginal mandibular nerve is the most common motor nerve injury. 33,34,37 Infections and deep vein thrombosis are both rare in face lift surgery, but are serious problems when encountered. 37,38 The data are not clear on what techniques are associated with worse safety profiles, but it does appear that certain techniques are associated with particular complications.…”
Section: Faceliftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33,34,37 Infections and deep vein thrombosis are both rare in face lift surgery, but are serious problems when encountered. 37,38 The data are not clear on what techniques are associated with worse safety profiles, but it does appear that certain techniques are associated with particular complications. 39,40 In a systematic review high lateral SMAS and composite techniques were found to have a 1.85 and 1.52 rate of temporary facial nerve injury, respectively, which was significantly greater than the 0.69% rate of temporary facial nerve injury in SMAS plication techniques.…”
Section: Faceliftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ASAPS), traditional surgical cosmetic procedures such as rhytidectomy, are still quite popular. However, surgical plastic surgery is rather aggressive, with long postoperative recovery time, there are also common complications such as scars, skin flap necrosis, infection, hematoma, seroma, greater auricular nerve injury and facial nerve injury, ear deformity, parotid duct injury, hair loss, poor aesthetic outcome, infection and deep vein thrombosis, as well as the risks associated with general anesthesia and even conscious sedation [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Known complications of facelift include hematoma formation, cobra neck deformity, seroma, skin necrosis, pixie ear deformity, injury to the facial or great auricular nerves, and dissatisfaction with the aesthetic outcome. 5-8 When SMAS imbrication is performed, complications may occur secondary to inadvertent injury to the parotid gland parenchyma or duct, to include sialocele, ductal stenosis, or even fistula. 9,10 Along those lines, one could conceive that postoperative complications more specific to parotid surgery could overlap with the complications observed in rhytidectomy, given the intimate anatomic relation of the parotid gland to the overlying SMAS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%