Abstract:Labor and delivery unit managers should distinctly assess both the proactiveness and systematicness of their existing management practices and consider how their practices could be modified to improve care.
“…Among a number of factors, optimal staffing for both physicians 38 and nurses 39 is critical for the provision of quality care. During weekends, hospitals are understaffed, 40 physicians are more likely to be less experienced, 41 and therefore, necessary interventions are often delayed 42 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies that were conducted in the United States were consistent with the result of this study, indicating that weekend delivery in the United States is significantly associated with an increase in adverse outcomes. 8,12 Among a number of factors, optimal staffing for both physicians 38 and nurses 39 is critical for the provision of quality care. During weekends, hospitals are understaffed, 40 physicians are more likely to be less experienced, 41 and therefore, necessary interventions are often delayed.…”
Background
Childbirth is the most common cause of hospital admission in the United States. Previous studies have shown that there might be a “weekend effect” in perinatal care, indicating that mothers and newborns whose deliveries occur during the weekends are at increased risk of having adverse outcomes. This study aims to isolate the association between the weekend delivery and maternal–neonatal adverse outcomes by investigating low‐risk pregnancies in nationwide data.
Methods
A population‐based study of all low‐risk pregnancies (in‐hospital, nonanomalous, term, normal birthweight, and singleton) was conducted based on US national natality data in 2017. Four maternal outcomes (ICU admission, uterine rupture, blood transfusion, and perineal laceration) and three neonatal outcomes (5‐minute Apgar <7, NICU admission, and neonatal death) were defined as adverse outcomes. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine the association, adjusting for 23 maternal and neonatal characteristics and risk factors.
Results
Among 3 011 577 low‐risk pregnancies, 6.0% were reported to have at least one of the maternal–neonatal adverse outcomes. Weekend deliveries were significantly associated with six maternal–neonatal adverse outcomes with an exception of neonatal death. In general, weekend deliveries were 1.13 times significantly as likely to have any of seven maternal–neonatal adverse outcomes than weekday deliveries (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.11‐1.14), being attributed to adverse outcomes of more than 4500 mother–newborn pairs.
Conclusions
Weekend delivery is a consistent risk factor for both mothers and babies at the national level. Furthermore, studies are needed about possible modifiable factors that mediate these associations to ensure safe childbirth regardless of the day of delivery.
“…Among a number of factors, optimal staffing for both physicians 38 and nurses 39 is critical for the provision of quality care. During weekends, hospitals are understaffed, 40 physicians are more likely to be less experienced, 41 and therefore, necessary interventions are often delayed 42 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies that were conducted in the United States were consistent with the result of this study, indicating that weekend delivery in the United States is significantly associated with an increase in adverse outcomes. 8,12 Among a number of factors, optimal staffing for both physicians 38 and nurses 39 is critical for the provision of quality care. During weekends, hospitals are understaffed, 40 physicians are more likely to be less experienced, 41 and therefore, necessary interventions are often delayed.…”
Background
Childbirth is the most common cause of hospital admission in the United States. Previous studies have shown that there might be a “weekend effect” in perinatal care, indicating that mothers and newborns whose deliveries occur during the weekends are at increased risk of having adverse outcomes. This study aims to isolate the association between the weekend delivery and maternal–neonatal adverse outcomes by investigating low‐risk pregnancies in nationwide data.
Methods
A population‐based study of all low‐risk pregnancies (in‐hospital, nonanomalous, term, normal birthweight, and singleton) was conducted based on US national natality data in 2017. Four maternal outcomes (ICU admission, uterine rupture, blood transfusion, and perineal laceration) and three neonatal outcomes (5‐minute Apgar <7, NICU admission, and neonatal death) were defined as adverse outcomes. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine the association, adjusting for 23 maternal and neonatal characteristics and risk factors.
Results
Among 3 011 577 low‐risk pregnancies, 6.0% were reported to have at least one of the maternal–neonatal adverse outcomes. Weekend deliveries were significantly associated with six maternal–neonatal adverse outcomes with an exception of neonatal death. In general, weekend deliveries were 1.13 times significantly as likely to have any of seven maternal–neonatal adverse outcomes than weekday deliveries (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.11‐1.14), being attributed to adverse outcomes of more than 4500 mother–newborn pairs.
Conclusions
Weekend delivery is a consistent risk factor for both mothers and babies at the national level. Furthermore, studies are needed about possible modifiable factors that mediate these associations to ensure safe childbirth regardless of the day of delivery.
“…During this phase, we conducted an extensive exploratory review of professional guidance, peer‐reviewed literature, and public quality improvement toolkits to understand the context of variation in obstetric outcomes in the United States. 3 , 4 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 We put particular emphasis on variation in hospital‐level cesarean birth rates based on broad stakeholder interest in the relationship between cesarean birth and value‐based care and precedent for cesarean as a proxy for quality of labor management. 20 , 21 We synthesized the broad range of strategies identified into higher‐level categories to consider targeting with our solution (eg, limiting cesareans for lack of progress in the latent phase, requiring a second opinion for intrapartum cesareans) and then developed a causation map of all potential strategies and the mechanisms through which they could affect cesarean birth rates.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 6 These failures may be because of, in part, clinical environments and care processes that are not well designed to support team‐based work. 7 , 8 , 9 Nonetheless, the science of designing, testing, and implementing care models that promote communication and teamwork remains nascent.…”
Background: Despite evidence that communication and teamwork are critical to patient safety, few care processes have been intentionally designed for this purpose in labor and delivery. The purpose of this project was to design an intrapartum care process that aims to improve communication and teamwork between clinicians and patients. Methods: We followed the "Double-Diamond" design method with four sequential steps: Discover, Define, Develop, and Deliver. In Discover, we searched professional guidelines and peer-reviewed literature to delineate the challenges to quality of intrapartum care and to uncover options for solutions. In Define, we convened an interdisciplinary group of experts to focus the problem scope and prioritize solution features. In Develop, we created initial prototype solutions. In Deliver, we engaged clinicians and patients in rapid cycle testing to iteratively produce a care process called "TeamBirth" that aims to improve team communication. Results: We designed TeamBirth, an intrapartum care process composed of brief team meetings ("huddles") between clinicians and patients. Huddles are navigated by a shared planning board placed in the labor and delivery room in view of the patient and their care team. The board promotes transparent and reliable communication and contains four areas to be acknowledged or discussed: (a) the names of the team members, starting with the patient; (b) the patient's preferences; (c) the care plan for the patient, baby, and labor progress; and (d) when the next team huddle is anticipated. Discussion: We identified an opportunity to improve the safety and dignity of childbirth care through an intrapartum care process that promotes reliable and structured communication and teamwork. Future work should evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of implementation and potential impact on safety and experience of care.
“…Eight years ago, as members of Dr. Gawande's health system innovation center, we led an effort to close this gap, beginning with a user‐informed understanding of the design principles and requirements. We surveyed thousands of pregnant women about how they perceive hospital quality and interviewed hundreds of nurses, physicians, and midwives to characterize key differences in their care processes 10–12 . The solution that emerged was called “TeamBirth,” which relies on a dry‐erase whiteboard on the wall of the labor room to organize conversations between the delivering provider, the nurse, and, most importantly, the person in labor (Figure 2).…”
Section: Designing Teamwork In Childbirthmentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.