Common But Differentiated Responsibilities Beyond the Nation State: How Is Differential Treatment Addressed in Transnational Climate Governance Initiatives?

Abstract

Many multilateral environmental agreements have adopted differentiated rules for different countries, based on the recognition of the 'common but differentiated responsibilities' (CBDRs) of states. By establishing two rigid groups of countries with and without emissions reduction obligations, the intergovernmental climate regime represents the most extreme case of such differentiation. The regime has struggled to overcome this rigidity and the resulting political deadlock between developing and developed countries. Transnational climate governance (TCG) initiatives have emerged as an alternative to provide mitigation, adaptation or finance outside the multilateral process. By drawing on synergies between public and private actors, it is hoped that they overcome the paralysis of the intergovernmental process. Yet, they take place in the same world of unequal peers, with different levels of capacity and responsibility for climate change. This article investigates the extent to which such TCG initiatives reflect the CBDR principle. Do different types of initiative -involving different types of actor or with different climate-related goals -address differentiation in distinct ways? Does taking account of CBDRs affect the membership of transnational initiatives? This article explores these questions empirically by analyzing a sample of TCG initiatives in terms of how they include differential treatment of states and non-state members. It concludes that TCG initiatives address differentiation in a pragmatic way. Most frequently, they either offer participants flexibility in how to implement their commitments, or provide support to members from developing countries. Such support is, so far, still insufficient to address the limited involvement of developing country actors.

Principio de las Responsabilidades Comunes pero Diferenciadas: un análisis de la internalización de la norma por parte del sector privado en Brasil (2005–2015)

“…Es la piedra basal de la arquitectura climática internacional al definir las principales normas, principios y normas que gobiernan la regulación de la temática a escala planetaria (Kiessling & Pacheco Alonso, 2019 ling & Pacheco Alonso, 2019; e.g.). En este contexto, el PRCD-RC comienza a adquirir una dimensión transnacional en la medida que la creciente participación de actores no estatales como agentes en la política internacional del cambio climático se enmarca bajo la internalización de normas tradicionalmente interestatales por parte del sector privado y del tercer sector (Castro, 2016). De esta manera, pese a que en sus orígenes el PRCD-RC era exclusivamente una norma interestatal, las transformaciones en la gobernanza climática que habilitaron la participación de nuevos actores en la política global del cambio climático, posibilitaron que los actores no estatales sean capaces de internalizar principios de gobernanza climática tales como el PRCD-RC, y que transformen su comportamiento a partir de un proceso de construcción de congruencia normativa mediante la localización (Acharya 2004;2011;2012).…”

Conceptualizing and Measuring Global Justice: Theories, Concepts, Principles and Indicators

“…Thirdly, due to different levels of economic development, there is unavoidably a gap among the various actors in terms of their access to resources, both technological and financial, for their preparation for and engagement in a concerted global undertaking (e.g., Castro 2016;Davidson 2017). Those who are better off will be expected to contribute more.…”

An Optimal Pollution Control Model for Environmental Protection Cooperation between Developing and Developed Countries

“…The Agreement also developed a Capacity-Building Initiative for Transparency to assist developing countries in building the necessary institutions and processes. Under the Paris Agreement, each country must determine, plan, and regularly report on its contributions to global warming mitigation [21]. However, under the Paris Agreement, should developed or developing countries take the main responsibilities for environmental protection in line with economic development?…”