Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Breeding

Jiménez, Oswalt R.

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-23400-3_5

Cited by 4 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 172 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In this context, this guideline has facilitated a high rate of grain exports and the recognition of Brazil as a major agricultural producer and world food exporter, producing nearly 239 million tons and exporting 123 million tons of grain in 2020, which represented a total of 37 billion dollars in 2020 and 419 billion between 2000 and 2020 (Aragao and Contini, 2021b). The foregoing suggests that, like Brazil, Colombia should take on new challenges in research, develop an optimal system that facilitates bioprospection and selection of promising microorganisms, the establishment of biofabric and the management of better technologies for the production of efficient inoculants for agriculture, since beans are a protein of great importance in areas vulnerable to climate change, since there is a population of producers of the peasant, family and community agriculture system, where the soils are poor in organic matter, without supplementary irrigation and with higher rates of food insecurity (Jiménez, 2019;Suárez et al, 2020).…”

Section: Active Ingredient Microbial Concentration Formulation Typementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Among the alternatives implemented in recent years are the techniques of inoculation, co-inoculation of rhizobia and other PGPR, as well as the joint application of HS and rhizobia co-inoculated with other PGPR, with the purpose of producing common beans in a sustainable manner and counteract some effects caused by climate change such as drought that have allowed to maintain or increase the production of this crop, considering that beans are the most cultivated vegetable protein in areas of high vulnerability to variability and climate change, besides, its management current agronomy is inefficient, causing a great environmental impact, which decreases the availability and absorption of nutrients, which is critical in arid zones, limiting productivity (Hungria et al, 2013a;Jiménez, 2019;Steiner et al, 2020).…”

Section: Active Ingredient Microbial Concentration Formulation Typementioning

confidence: 99%

“…The common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is the most cultivated species in the world of the genus Phaseolus (Jiménez, 2019). The cultivation of this legume is of great interest for family farming and the peasant economy, due to its inclusion in the family basket and nutritional value, derived from its high content of protein, carbohydrates and some minerals (Abdulrahman et al 2021).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Scopping review: use of biofertilizers and humic substances in Phaseolus vulgaris (Fabaceae) for dry zones

Aguirre-Pérez,

Suárez-Fragozo,

Arias-Sarabia

et al. 2023

Rev. Colomb. Cienc. Hortic

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The common bean crop in dry areas is affected by the climate change and the low availability of nutrients that limits its yield. The objective of this review was to analyze the scope of the scientific literature on the use of inoculants based on Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and humic substances (HS) in sustainable agronomic management of common bean crop and drought tolerance, for the generation of recommendations applicable to the production cultivation in dry areas from low tropic. An exploratory review on the use of PGPR and SH in common bean was carried out, since the first publications until December 2022 in the databases: Science direct, SciElo, SpringerLink, Scopus, Pubmed and Proquest. The co-inoculation of rhizobia with other PGPR was the most frequent technique in the reviewed articles. However, the combined application with SH allows greater tolerance to the water stress caused by drought. Rhizobia species most reported as efficient were Rhizobium tropici, Rhizobium etli and the strain CIAT 899 (R. tropici). In addition, the strain CIAT 899 was found to be the most useful in inoculant formulations for common beans under drought conditions in Brazil. In Colombia, only one registered product based on Rhizobium phaseoli was found for common bean, although there are no reports of evaluation of this strain under drought stress conditions.

show abstract

Section: Active Ingredient Microbial Concentration Formulation Typementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Active Ingredient Microbial Concentration Formulation Typementioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Scopping review: use of biofertilizers and humic substances in Phaseolus vulgaris (Fabaceae) for dry zones

Aguirre-Pérez,

Suárez-Fragozo,

Arias-Sarabia

et al. 2023

Rev. Colomb. Cienc. Hortic

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L., 2n = 2x = 22) is doubtlessly the most important grain legume for direct human consumption (Jiménez, 2019). Wild ancestors of the crop that inhabit a relatively narrow ecological niche with soil and climate traits of its own (Central and South America) were domesticated.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implications of additive × additive epistasis for common bean breeding

de Melo,

Coimbra,

da Silva

et al. 2024

Euphytica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The presence of epistasis in complex traits can be signi cant and affect the selection of segregating populations undesirably. The purpose of this study was to determine the epistatic genetic components that in uence root and shoot traits of common bean and identify their effect on the performance of segregating populations. The eld experiment consisted of 49 treatments (backcross progenies, parents and segregating populations in the F 2 and F 3 generations). The cross P 1 -BAF53 (Andean) x P 2 -IPR 88 Uirapuru (Mesoamerican) as reference. Six traits were taken into consideration: root distribution (%), rst pod length (cm), number of grains (plot), plant height (cm), reproductive cycle (days) and number of basal branches (plot). Additive x additive epistasis signi cantly affected 50% of the above traits. For root distribution (RD), this genetic component deteriorated the mean performance of the progenies in relation to the parents, regardless of the presence of dominance deviations and additive x dominant and dominant x dominant epistasis. In addition, lower variation in the different generations (parents and F 2 and F 3 progenies) was found for RD than for the other traits. Rather, no additive x additive interaction component for plant height was detected, but predominance of genetic deviations of dominance and transgressive segregation events were identi ed. Thus, additive x additive epistasis can hamper the success of a breeding program, for being associated with low-variability traits. This fact may be related with the number of crosses and/or the choice of genetically more distant parents for the program, and possibly with the presence of linked genes.

show abstract

“…However, current situation regarding the climate change, as well as the lack of acceptance of adequate cultivating technologies, have affected the common bean production in negative terms. That is why new methods and approaches in breeding strategies should be accepted (Jiménez, 2019). Genetic variability analysis allows breeders to gain information about germplasm and estimate its genetic potential.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Genetic Diversity Analysis of Common Bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) Genotypes Using Scot Polymorphism

Hromadová

Mikolášová²,

Balážová³

et al. 2022

J microb biotech food sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is legume crop of worldwide importance and due to optimal content of proteins and other essential compounds it has a potential as a functional food. Genetic diversity studies are significant from the point of obtaining information important for breeding process. The goal of present work was to analyze genetic diversity among 34 genotypes of common bean from different countries using 5 SCoT (Start Codon Targeted) markers. Altogether 82 DNA fragments were amplified, out of which 66 fragments were polymorphic with an average of 11 polymorphic fragments per primer. The highest number of polymorphic fragments was detected by marker SCoT 59 (15). The percentage of polymorphism ranged from 57.17% (SCoT 2) to 78.57% (SCoT 19) with an average of 67.3%. PIC values varied from 0.719 (SCoT 19) to 0.886 (SCoT 3) and average PIC value was 0.802. The DI values varied between 0.722 (SCoT 19) and 0.888 (SCoT3), with an average of 0.804. The dendrogram of 34 genotypes of common bean, constructed based on hierarchical cluster analysis separated genotypes into two clusters (I and II). Cluster I was formed by two subclusters. Thirty-three genotypes were included in cluster I and genotype Albena (Slovak Republic), which significantly differed from other genotypes in seed size was included in cluster II. Obtained results support the effectiveness of SCoT markers in the analysis of common bean useful for genotypes differentiating and assessment of genetic diversity in the set of common bean germplasm.

show abstract

Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Breeding

Cited by 4 publications

References 172 publications

Scopping review: use of biofertilizers and humic substances in Phaseolus vulgaris (Fabaceae) for dry zones

Scopping review: use of biofertilizers and humic substances in Phaseolus vulgaris (Fabaceae) for dry zones

Implications of additive × additive epistasis for common bean breeding

Genetic Diversity Analysis of Common Bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) Genotypes Using Scot Polymorphism

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About