2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00406-013-0445-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Common and disease-specific dysfunctions of brain systems underlying attentional and executive control in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder

Abstract: Schizophrenia and bipolar disorder broadly overlap in multiple areas involving clinical phenomenology, genetics, and neurobiology. Still, the investigation into specific elementary (sub-)processes of executive functioning may help to define clear points of distinction between these categorical diagnoses to validate the nosological dichotomy and, indirectly, to further elucidate their pathophysiological underpinnings. In the present behavioral study, we sought to separate common from diagnosis-specific deficits… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a previous behavioral study, schizophrenic patients showed a deficit in the shielding of task relevant processing from distracting irrelevant stimulus information, both in conflicting situations and in situations with an irrelevant oddball [31]. The underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of that deficit have not been directly investigated so far, although there are several studies using oddballs [39]- [45] and conflicts in the investigation of neurofunctional changes in schizophrenia [46]- [51].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a previous behavioral study, schizophrenic patients showed a deficit in the shielding of task relevant processing from distracting irrelevant stimulus information, both in conflicting situations and in situations with an irrelevant oddball [31]. The underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of that deficit have not been directly investigated so far, although there are several studies using oddballs [39]- [45] and conflicts in the investigation of neurofunctional changes in schizophrenia [46]- [51].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an adapted version of the combined oddball-incongruence task patients with schizophrenia exhibited specific impairments in both oddball and incongruency trials, which might indicate that a common cognitive process, underlying both task, is disrupted rather than a process specific to either oddballs or incongruency. The shielding of task relevant processing from distracting irrelevant stimulus information is necessary to perform in both tasks and it might therefore be concluded that this process is disrupted in that group of patients [31]. But the question, whether this disruption arises due to the same neural mechanism of a heightened sensitivity of the background-monitoring system (or parts of it) to distracting information, remains to be answered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it has repeatedly been shown that schizophrenia patients suffer from greater cognitive impairment than bipolar disorder patients [ 40 44 ]. Consequently, their compensation mechanisms seem to be more limited than in affective disorders which may explain the missing compensatory activation in frontal brain areas observed in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also possible that the BD-related findings observed here are not specific to emotion, but rather relate to more general difficulties in receiving different information simultaneously. Indeed, it is widely recognized that patients with BD exhibit pervasive deficits in executive functioning that translate to difficulties in shifting between information sources and simultaneously thinking about multiple concepts (McKirdy et al, 2009; Melcher et al, 2013). Such neurocognitive deficits have been shown to underpin unimodal emotion processing in schizophrenia populations (Brekke, Kay, Lee, & Green, 2005), and it is certainly possible that our results reflect the downstream outcome of this cognitive inflexibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%