Commercially pure titanium implants with surfaces modified by laser beam with and without chemical deposition of apatite. Biomechanical and topographical analysis in rabbits
Abstract:It was concluded that the implants LS, HAB, and HABT presented physicochemical and topographical properties superior to those of AS and MS and favored the osseointegration process in the shorter periods. In addition, HAB showed the best results when compared with other surfaces.
“…Here, continuing our studies evaluating these modified implant surfaces, in which we have previously assessed LS, HAB, and HABT surfaces by means of biomechanical analysis [28], we aimed to evaluate the surfaces of commercially pure titanium implants (cp Ti) modified by laser beam (LS) with and without hydroxyapatite (HA) deposition by biomimetic method, without (HAB) and with heat treatment (HABT), comparing them with implants with surfaces modified by treatment with acid (AS) and with machined surface (MS) by means of histomorphometric analysis. The rational for this study is that implant surface treatment plays a major role in implant osseointegration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The cp Ti implants were fixed at the rotating device under the pulsed laser equipment 20 W Yb (Ytterbium Pulsed Fiber Laser System Omnimark 20F, Ominitek Tecnologia Ltda, Sao Paulo, Brazil) with the parameters of nominal power and pulse rate of 140 mJ and 20 KHz, respectively. The laser beam was projected onto the entire surface of the implant threads in room atmosphere, as previously described [28].…”
Section: Surface Modification By Laser Beammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protocol was established following previous protocol [28]. Briefly, the samples were immersed in 50 mL of NaOH (5.0 mol/L) in the oven for a period of 24 h at 60°C for surface activation.…”
Section: Modified Surface By Laser Beam and Ha Deposition Using The Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another surface modification employed to accelerate implant osseointegration and favoring bone tissue interaction is surface coated with ceramic Ca-P [12,[27][28][29][30]. The Ca-P is released in the peri-implant region increasing the saturation of body fluid with consequent biological apatite precipitation on the implant surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Irradiation of the surface by laser beam prior to the chemical deposition of apatites by biomimetic method improves the physical-chemical bond stability between the coatings and implant surface. This is due to the formation of titanium oxides at the implant surface after irradiation with laser beam and its high affinity for Ca and P present in SBF [28,29,[45][46][47].…”
Our study provides evidence that LS, HAB, and HABT-modified surfaces improved bone-to-implant contact and increased bone formation around osseointegrated implants compared to conventional machined implants favoring the osseointegration process.
“…Here, continuing our studies evaluating these modified implant surfaces, in which we have previously assessed LS, HAB, and HABT surfaces by means of biomechanical analysis [28], we aimed to evaluate the surfaces of commercially pure titanium implants (cp Ti) modified by laser beam (LS) with and without hydroxyapatite (HA) deposition by biomimetic method, without (HAB) and with heat treatment (HABT), comparing them with implants with surfaces modified by treatment with acid (AS) and with machined surface (MS) by means of histomorphometric analysis. The rational for this study is that implant surface treatment plays a major role in implant osseointegration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The cp Ti implants were fixed at the rotating device under the pulsed laser equipment 20 W Yb (Ytterbium Pulsed Fiber Laser System Omnimark 20F, Ominitek Tecnologia Ltda, Sao Paulo, Brazil) with the parameters of nominal power and pulse rate of 140 mJ and 20 KHz, respectively. The laser beam was projected onto the entire surface of the implant threads in room atmosphere, as previously described [28].…”
Section: Surface Modification By Laser Beammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protocol was established following previous protocol [28]. Briefly, the samples were immersed in 50 mL of NaOH (5.0 mol/L) in the oven for a period of 24 h at 60°C for surface activation.…”
Section: Modified Surface By Laser Beam and Ha Deposition Using The Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another surface modification employed to accelerate implant osseointegration and favoring bone tissue interaction is surface coated with ceramic Ca-P [12,[27][28][29][30]. The Ca-P is released in the peri-implant region increasing the saturation of body fluid with consequent biological apatite precipitation on the implant surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Irradiation of the surface by laser beam prior to the chemical deposition of apatites by biomimetic method improves the physical-chemical bond stability between the coatings and implant surface. This is due to the formation of titanium oxides at the implant surface after irradiation with laser beam and its high affinity for Ca and P present in SBF [28,29,[45][46][47].…”
Our study provides evidence that LS, HAB, and HABT-modified surfaces improved bone-to-implant contact and increased bone formation around osseointegrated implants compared to conventional machined implants favoring the osseointegration process.
Biologic behavior of the bone tissue around implants with four different surfaces was evaluated. The surfaces were: modified by laser (LS); modified by laser with sodium silicate deposition (SS); and commercially available surfaces modified by acid etching (AS) and machined surface (MS). Topographic characterization of the surfaces was performed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM)- energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDX) before experimental surgery. Thirty rabbits received 60 implants in their right and left tibias, 1 implant of each surface being placed in each tibia. The analyzed periods were 4, 8, and 12 weeks postoperatively. Histometric analysis was performed evaluating bone interface contact (BIC) and bone area (BA). The results obtained were submitted to the analysis of variance and the Tukey t-test. The elemental mapping was evaluated by means of SEM at 4 weeks postoperatively. The topographic characterization showed differences between the analyzed surfaces. Generally, the BIC and BA of LS and SS implants were statistically higher than those of AS and MS in most of the analyzed periods. Elemental mapping showed high peaks of calcium and phosphorous in all groups. Based on the present methodology, it may be concluded that experimental modifications LS and SS accelerated the stages of the bone tissue repair process around the implants, providing the highest degree of osseointegration.
Within the limitations of this study, only the increase in surface roughness (Ra > 1) at 56 days demonstrated statistically significant effects on RTQ. Other additional surface features, such as sub-micron scale DCD, demonstrated improved healing trends but without significance for clinical applications.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.