The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02471.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Commercially pure titanium implants with surfaces modified by laser beam with and without chemical deposition of apatite. Biomechanical and topographical analysis in rabbits

Abstract: It was concluded that the implants LS, HAB, and HABT presented physicochemical and topographical properties superior to those of AS and MS and favored the osseointegration process in the shorter periods. In addition, HAB showed the best results when compared with other surfaces.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
52
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, continuing our studies evaluating these modified implant surfaces, in which we have previously assessed LS, HAB, and HABT surfaces by means of biomechanical analysis [28], we aimed to evaluate the surfaces of commercially pure titanium implants (cp Ti) modified by laser beam (LS) with and without hydroxyapatite (HA) deposition by biomimetic method, without (HAB) and with heat treatment (HABT), comparing them with implants with surfaces modified by treatment with acid (AS) and with machined surface (MS) by means of histomorphometric analysis. The rational for this study is that implant surface treatment plays a major role in implant osseointegration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Here, continuing our studies evaluating these modified implant surfaces, in which we have previously assessed LS, HAB, and HABT surfaces by means of biomechanical analysis [28], we aimed to evaluate the surfaces of commercially pure titanium implants (cp Ti) modified by laser beam (LS) with and without hydroxyapatite (HA) deposition by biomimetic method, without (HAB) and with heat treatment (HABT), comparing them with implants with surfaces modified by treatment with acid (AS) and with machined surface (MS) by means of histomorphometric analysis. The rational for this study is that implant surface treatment plays a major role in implant osseointegration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The cp Ti implants were fixed at the rotating device under the pulsed laser equipment 20 W Yb (Ytterbium Pulsed Fiber Laser System Omnimark 20F, Ominitek Tecnologia Ltda, Sao Paulo, Brazil) with the parameters of nominal power and pulse rate of 140 mJ and 20 KHz, respectively. The laser beam was projected onto the entire surface of the implant threads in room atmosphere, as previously described [28].…”
Section: Surface Modification By Laser Beammentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations