1965
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9163(65)90397-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comments on the equivalence of different integral equations formulated to describe the Fabry-Perot interferometer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1965
1965
1966
1966

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When x1 moves in the interval (-1,l) the contributions are the same over entire range and the FRESNEL Integral may be evaluated to a constant. Hence, the diffraction effects vanish in this limit and we are left with the simple H n Y a E N S Principle, [9]. This pict m , however, changes if F is large but finite.…”
Section: Asymptotic Expansionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…When x1 moves in the interval (-1,l) the contributions are the same over entire range and the FRESNEL Integral may be evaluated to a constant. Hence, the diffraction effects vanish in this limit and we are left with the simple H n Y a E N S Principle, [9]. This pict m , however, changes if F is large but finite.…”
Section: Asymptotic Expansionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The first-order approximation corresponds t o the geometrical-optics formulation and thus does not account for diffraction. The integral equations in the more familiar papers are identical t o this first-order approximation of (9) and hence, they discount diffraction effects. Those results and conclusions are therefore qnestionable since too small a value for the FRESNEL Number has seemingly been used.…”
Section: Asymptotic Expansionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations