1996
DOI: 10.1002/polb.1996.948
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Commentary: Reflections on “Some phenomenological consequences of the Doi-Edwards theory of viscoelasticity,” by William W. Graessley,J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Phys. Ed., 18, 27 (1980)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

46
755
3
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 408 publications
(805 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
46
755
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…27). The corresponding molecular weight of the effective gel strands, M c ¼ ð1 À f guest ÞRT=G e ¼ $ 15 Â 10 3 ( = PDMS density, R = gas constant, and T = absolute temperature), was considerably smaller than the prepolymer molecular weight (84 Â 10 3 ) and rather close to the entanglement molecular weight (M e ¼ $ 8:1 Â 10 3 for PDMS 28 ), indicating that Gel-U prepared through the end-linking reaction in bulk contained densely trapped entanglements. 27 This Gel-U sample, supplied in a form of thick disk of the thickness ¼ $ 5 mm, was carefully sliced with a razor into rectangular specimens of the thickness ¼ $ 1 mm, length ¼ $ 20 mm, and width ¼ $ 10 mm, and these specimens were utilized in the elongational test.…”
Section: Experimental Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…27). The corresponding molecular weight of the effective gel strands, M c ¼ ð1 À f guest ÞRT=G e ¼ $ 15 Â 10 3 ( = PDMS density, R = gas constant, and T = absolute temperature), was considerably smaller than the prepolymer molecular weight (84 Â 10 3 ) and rather close to the entanglement molecular weight (M e ¼ $ 8:1 Â 10 3 for PDMS 28 ), indicating that Gel-U prepared through the end-linking reaction in bulk contained densely trapped entanglements. 27 This Gel-U sample, supplied in a form of thick disk of the thickness ¼ $ 5 mm, was carefully sliced with a razor into rectangular specimens of the thickness ¼ $ 1 mm, length ¼ $ 20 mm, and width ¼ $ 10 mm, and these specimens were utilized in the elongational test.…”
Section: Experimental Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result unequivocally indicates that the gel strands therein have a broad molecular weight distribution, as fully discussed previously. 25,26 The width of this distribution can be estimated by fitting the G 0 and G 00 data shown in Figure 1 with a Rouse network model: 25,26 Since M w,sol (¼ 45:8 Â 10 3 ) of the sol chains is larger than the entanglement molecular weight for PDMS, M e ¼ 8:1 Â 10 3 , 28 sol of the sol chains is affected by the entanglement with the gel strands as well as the entanglement among the sol chains. From the bulk viscosity data of entangled linear PDMS chains, sol of those sol chains was estimated to be 3 Pa s with the method explained in Appendix A. Utilizing this sol value, we attempted to fit the G 0 and G 00 data of Gel-1/1 with eq 2 to estimate the molecular weight distribution of the strands.…”
Section: Molecular Weight Distribution Of As-prepared Gel-1/1 Strandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the number of chain entanglements are very limited in the MIM triblocks, the deformation stress is not dissipated by the central block, but directly transferred to the PMMA microdomains. M e for PIOA and for PnBA has been calculated from rheological measurements [27][28][29][30], on the basis of Eq. (3) ( Table 2):…”
Section: Stress-strain Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,10 Therefore, we believe a consistent and convincing physical mechanism for the anomalous frequency dependence of the initial decay of the disentanglement process remains to be identified theoretically, and it must be different from the mechanism leading to non-reptation-like scaling of the longest relaxation time or viscosity. In PMC theory, this mechanism is the tracer shape fluctuations, as has been shown in section 3.A of paper I, and will further be discussed in section 3.E where the dielectric measurements of Adachi and co-workers 9 are analyzed; see also refs 25-27. Whereas various different non-self-consistent phenomenological formulations of the constraint release mechanism [12][13][14]25 have been considered as extensions of the reptation/tube approach, the constraint porosity effects of the PMC description, captured in e.g., eqs I. 68 and I.69, have no analog in the phenomenological models for polymer melts and solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 The consideration of the dynamics of the surrounding matrix is an aspect of PMC theory it shares with the constraint release models of Graessley 12 and Klein. 13,14 Whereas, in these two approaches, the diffusion coefficients of the reptative and constraint release dynamics are phenomenologically added, in the PMC approach the effects of both decay channels on the entanglement friction functions depend on length scale and are derived from one set of approximations for the microscopic intermolecular forces, as shown in eqs I.11-I.27 of paper I.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%