2016
DOI: 10.1111/add.13246
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Commentary on Ogeil et al. (2016): Explaining increased alcohol‐related harm and stable per capita consumption in Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several lines of action proposed to target reducing alcohol intake in Australia, including the removal of a tax subsidy that makes wine inexpensive to buy in bulk and instigation of harsher taxation for other alcoholic beverages [ 44 ]. Research suggests that pricing interventions hold promise to reduce intake, particularly for heavy drinkers [ 45 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several lines of action proposed to target reducing alcohol intake in Australia, including the removal of a tax subsidy that makes wine inexpensive to buy in bulk and instigation of harsher taxation for other alcoholic beverages [ 44 ]. Research suggests that pricing interventions hold promise to reduce intake, particularly for heavy drinkers [ 45 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite this stabilisation of per capita consumption, alcohol‐related harms have increased in the past decade (AIHW, ). This is explained by an ageing population and changing drinking patterns, with an increasing numbers of abstainers but more binge drinkers (Hall and Chan, ).…”
Section: Alcohol Consumption and Policies In Australiamentioning
confidence: 99%