2001
DOI: 10.1063/1.1386622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comment on “Evidence for phase-explosion and generation of large particles during high power nanosecond laser ablation of silicon” [Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 783 (2000)]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
1
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One more thing to note from figures 9(c) and (d) is that homogeneous boiling starts to occur at around 1 × 10 8 W cm −2 , which is the lowest laser intensity used in this study. The experimental results (figures 6 and 7) prove this, and as mentioned earlier, a similar result was reported in the literature [19].…”
Section: Intensitysupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One more thing to note from figures 9(c) and (d) is that homogeneous boiling starts to occur at around 1 × 10 8 W cm −2 , which is the lowest laser intensity used in this study. The experimental results (figures 6 and 7) prove this, and as mentioned earlier, a similar result was reported in the literature [19].…”
Section: Intensitysupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Considering the size of the debris, it is believed that they are formed mainly from the sub-surface homogeneous nucleation rather than surface evaporation. In fact, it was reported [19] that the ejection of droplets was detected during laser ablation of silicon at 1.06 µm for an irradiance as low as 1.1 × 10 −8 W cm −2 , which is close to the lowest intensity level used in this experiment. This fact is also proved by the simulation results below.…”
Section: Solidification Between the Pulsessupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main concern in Craciun's comment, 3 as noted in the last paragraph, is the higher threshold irradiance for explosive boiling determined in Ref. 1 than that reported in other studies.…”
contrasting
confidence: 42%