2015
DOI: 10.1007/s40121-015-0063-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comment on: “Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation of the 10-Valent Pneumococcal Non-Typeable Haemophilus influenzae Protein D Conjugate Vaccine and 13-Valent Pneumococcal Vaccine in Japanese Children”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, surveillance from PCV10-only countries have failed to show any sustained reduction in 19A invasive disease, as previously discussed. [22][23][24][25] Second, there have not been any conclusive evidence of the lack of PCV13 effectiveness against serotype 3. Finally the assumption that PCV10 has effectiveness against NTHi disease has been widely and repeatedly challenged.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, surveillance from PCV10-only countries have failed to show any sustained reduction in 19A invasive disease, as previously discussed. [22][23][24][25] Second, there have not been any conclusive evidence of the lack of PCV13 effectiveness against serotype 3. Finally the assumption that PCV10 has effectiveness against NTHi disease has been widely and repeatedly challenged.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally the assumption that PCV10 has effectiveness against NTHi disease has been widely and repeatedly challenged. [22][23][24][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] In addition, of note, by definition, IPD is a severe condition caused by streptococcus pnemoniae, not caused by NTHi. The assumption that PCV10 provided protection against invasive NTHi is not supported by any scientific evidence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…effectiveness of the vaccine against serotype 3 ( Table 3). The validity of these assumptions remains highly debated in the literature [8,48] and are described below.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…has been contested due to a lack of scientific evidence supporting significant reductions in NTHi-AOM[48,[57][58][59][60][61][62][63]. The Clinical Otitis Media and Pneumonia Study (COMPAS) did not show a significant effect for PCV10-GSK on NTHi-clinically confirmed AOM[63].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Allegedly, one of the reasons that a Secretary of Health in our country was summarily dismissed from Office was his controversial decision to procure Pneumonia Conjugate Vaccine (PCV) 10 over PCV13. Existing CEA studies showed that both PCV 10 and PCV13 were cost effective based on GDP per capita with PCV 13 moderately more cost-effective [3][4][5][6]. During this time, information about the protective effect of Protein D carrier unique to PCV10 against H. influenzae disease has yet to be explored.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%