“…Recently, Yuan, Tang, and Ao (abbreviated as YTA comment in later text) assert in their comment 4 to ZL paper that ZL's non-uniqueness result for SDE decomposition was "incorrect" because a "counter-example" based on O-U process is available to demonstrate the uniqueness, and the starting point of ZL's paper is not their exact definition of SDE decomposition theory, which already contains the boundary conditions to ensure the uniqueness. In this response, we will illustrate the flaws of such conclusions.…”